Looks like another big round of leaks is coming.

[Nookies]

Awesome. Seeing numerous teaser pics with the annoying watermark all over them. It was the same watermark with the Selena Gomez leaks. Looks like we're in for a fun ride boyos.

[sports_fan39]

is this true or no, when is said leak/s coming

Serious question: How is looking at the nudes of someone who didn't consent to their release any different than being a peeping tom watching a woman changing or getting out of the shower?

There are thousands of women who willingly take off their clothes for money or even for free. Don't be a party to the abuse of those who didn't consent to their nudes being released.

[firekind]

Originally Posted by reclaimer

Serious question: How is looking at the nudes of someone who didn't consent to their release any different than being a peeping tom watching a woman changing or getting out of the shower?

There are thousands of women who willingly take off their clothes for money or even for free. Don't be a party to the abuse of those who didn't consent to their nudes being released.

Right. Selina Gomez should do more pissing videos.

[AJEngland]

Originally Posted by reclaimer

Serious question: How is looking at the nudes of someone who didn't consent to their release any different than being a peeping tom watching a woman changing or getting out of the shower?

There are thousands of women who willingly take off their clothes for money or even for free. Don't be a party to the abuse of those who didn't consent to their nudes being released.

The only difference is it enables the creeps who view them to convince themselves it's fine as it's only on the internet.

[wsbfan1]

Peeping toms? Violating their rights? Enabling creeps? Oh please. Boohoo fucking hoo......

The majority of there pics are selfies that they've been stupid enough to send to boyfriends, husbands or other celebs they want to hook up with. Or they're sextapes they made with them. If you're so stupid that you let some c-list rapper film you with their cock in your mouth AND DON'T think they'll sell or post it after you break up or they're broke, you're an idiot and deserve what you get.

This is real easy. If you don't want your nudes posted on the net, don't send them out. Otherwise, enjoy the free publicity.

[Johnny Cage]

Originally Posted by wsbfan1

Peeping toms? Violating their rights? Enabling creeps? Oh please. Boohoo fucking hoo......

The majority of there pics are selfies that they've been stupid enough to send to boyfriends, husbands or other celebs they want to hook up with. Or they're sextapes they made with them. If you're so stupid that you let some c-list rapper film you with their cock in your mouth AND DON'T think they'll sell or post it after you break up or they're broke, you're an idiot and deserve what you get.

This is real easy. If you don't want your nudes posted on the net, don't send them out. Otherwise, enjoy the free publicity.

FWIW, IIRC the previous big leak was not linked back to revenge porn (the behavior you are describing) but a series of hacks. There were several theories, one of which was that the devices were accessed within some location where the celebrities had used a public wifi.
e.g. Mary Elizabeth Winstead's nudes had only been shared with her husband and only she and her husband had them on their devices (based on her own claims anyway).
So it's not even about "don't be stupid enough to send your hook-up nudes". The large majority of the previous leaks were not acquired in this way.
I tend to agree it's morally dubious to watch this stuff but I'm not anyone's parent on here so you do whatever you feel like doing.

[pantyworship]

Originally Posted by reclaimer

Serious question: How is looking at the nudes of someone who didn't consent to their release any different than being a peeping tom watching a woman changing or getting out of the shower?

There are thousands of women who willingly take off their clothes for money or even for free. Don't be a party to the abuse of those who didn't consent to their nudes being released.

weeeellll you're not wrong, of course, but I ain't made of stone here!

[DoctorNo]

I think some of them might be doing it on purpose. That they are leaks not hacks. From what I can tell Kristen Stewart has had it happen several times over the years. You figure she would have stopped putting nudes on the cloud after the first time.

[alexora]

The way I see it, is if a celebrity sends a 'candid' image to their partner or friend, this does not give carte blanche to hackers to steal those pictures and disseminate them on the web.

I far prefer faked celeb porn images to stolen images: the former appease our fantasies, the latter are an intrusion into a person's private persona.