Online free porn at mobile phone

Rapier · 6th August 2013, 19:24

hi
i was going to download video from

Code:

l3ch369

there are two best options to download:

Code:

http://prntscr.com/1jqosu

hd ready and full hd

i googled that hd ready can be 720p or 1080p. full hd can be only 1080p.
but they lie in some specific probably older scene, because i have downloaded from both ways and here is files description.

hd ready was downloading size: 630 mb
full had was: 489 mb

here is copied info for bigger one file:
part1:

Code:

[Used Filter List]
(1) MP4 Source
(2) Video Codec/Transform
(3) Enhanced Video Renderer(Custom Present)
(4) Audio Codec/Transform
(5) DirectSound Audio Renderer

[Video Information]
Video Codec:avc1 - FFmpeg Decoder(h264)
Input type:avc1(24 bits)
Input size:1280 x 720(1.78:1)
Output type:YUY2(16 bits)
Output Size:1280 x 720(1.78:1)
Frame Rate:25.00
BitRate: Unknown

[Audio Information]
Audio Codec:AAC(0xaac0) - Default Decoder
Sample rate:44100 ->44100 samples / sec
Bit rate:16 ->16 bits / sample
Channels:2 ->2 channels
Bitrate: 0 kbps

part2:

Code:

file path on my hdd    xxx.mp4
  General
    Complete name : file path on my hdd    xxx.mp4
    Format : MPEG-4
    Format profile : Base Media
    Codec ID : isom
    File size : 630 MiB
    Duration : 40mn 39s
    Overall bit rate mode : Variable
    Overall bit rate : 2 165 Kbps
    Writing application : Lavf52.93.0
  Video #1
    ID : 1
    Format : AVC
    Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
    Format profile : High@L3.1
    Format settings, CABAC : Yes
    Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
    Codec ID : avc1
    Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
    Duration : 40mn 39s
    Bit rate : 2 048 Kbps
    Width : 1 280 pixels
    Height : 720 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 16:9
    Frame rate mode : Constant
    Frame rate : 25.000 fps
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Progressive
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.089
    Stream size : 596 MiB (95%)
    Writing library : x264 core 107
    Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=4 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=umh / subme=8 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=4 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=0 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=3 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=40 / rc=abr / mbtree=1 / bitrate=2048 / ratetol=1.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=10 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / ip_ratio=1.41 / aq=1:1.00
  Audio #2
    ID : 2
    Format : AAC
    Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
    Format profile : LC
    Codec ID : 40
    Duration : 40mn 39s
    Bit rate mode : Variable
    Bit rate : 112 Kbps
    Channel(s) : 2 channels
    Channel positions : Front: L R
    Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
    Compression mode : Lossy
    Delay relative to video : 40ms
    Stream size : 32.5 MiB (5%)

smaller file:
part1:

Code:

[Used Filter List]
(1) MP4 Source
(2) Video Codec/Transform
(3) Enhanced Video Renderer(Custom Present)
(4) Audio Codec/Transform
(5) DirectSound Audio Renderer

[Video Information]
Video Codec:avc1 - FFmpeg Decoder(h264)
Input type:avc1(24 bits)
Input size:1280 x 720(1.78:1)
Output type:YUY2(16 bits)
Output Size:1280 x 720(1.78:1)
Frame Rate:25.00
BitRate: Unknown

[Audio Information]
Audio Codec:AAC(0xaac0) - Default Decoder
Sample rate:44100 ->44100 samples / sec
Bit rate:16 ->16 bits / sample
Channels:2 ->2 channels
Bitrate: 77 kbps

part2:

Code:

file path on my hdd    xxx.mp4
  General
    Complete name : file path on my hdd    xxx.mp4
    Format : MPEG-4
    Format profile : Base Media / Version 2
    Codec ID : mp42
    File size : 489 MiB
    Duration : 40mn 40s
    Overall bit rate mode : Variable
    Overall bit rate : 1 680 Kbps
    Encoded date : UTC 2013-04-18 12:24:02
    Tagged date : UTC 2013-04-18 16:14:08
    Writing application : HandBrake 0.9.8 2012071800
  Video #1
    ID : 1
    Format : AVC
    Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
    Format profile : High@L3.1
    Format settings, CABAC : Yes
    Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
    Codec ID : avc1
    Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
    Duration : 40mn 39s
    Bit rate mode : Variable
    Bit rate : 1 600 Kbps
    Width : 1 280 pixels
    Height : 720 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 16:9
    Frame rate mode : Constant
    Frame rate : 25.000 fps
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Progressive
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.069
    Stream size : 465 MiB (95%)
    Writing library : x264 core 120
    Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=3 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=hex / subme=7 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=3 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=1 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=50 / rc=abr / mbtree=1 / bitrate=1600 / ratetol=1.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=3 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00
    Encoded date : UTC 2013-04-18 12:24:02
    Tagged date : UTC 2013-04-18 16:14:07
    Color primaries : BT.709
    Transfer characteristics : BT.709
    Matrix coefficients : BT.709
  Audio #2
    ID : 2
    Format : AAC
    Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
    Format profile : LC
    Codec ID : 40
    Duration : 40mn 40s
    Bit rate mode : Variable
    Bit rate : 77.9 Kbps
    Maximum bit rate : 90.0 Kbps
    Channel(s) : 2 channels
    Channel positions : Front: L R
    Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
    Compression mode : Lossy
    Delay relative to video : 80ms
    Stream size : 22.7 MiB (5%)
    Encoded date : UTC 2013-04-18 12:24:02
    Tagged date : UTC 2013-04-18 16:14:04

so which file has higher visible quality, or which should i download ?

ty v much for opinions

there is difference in:
codec ID
writing application
writing library (core number)
...

OddBa11 · 7th August 2013, 06:42

They isn't likely any noticeable difference between the two depending on how it's displayed.

They are the same resolution. The file size differences are a result of the codec used.

Why not download both and test for yourself?

Pad · 7th August 2013, 08:39

Ultimately you'll have to download both versions and compare - but I would think that the first file would be better quality as it has a higher bitrate of 2048kbs vs. 1600kbs for the smaller.

A lot will depend on what you are using to view it - a crappy 7 year old monitor like mine or a proper HD TV.

Having said that, I would comment that even the first file doesn't really have true HD specs - 2048kbs is a very low bitrate for HD. A lot of sites claim to be offering HD when they aren't at all because of the low bitrate encoding. Just consider that a Blu-ray disc (which is true HD) - has a max bitrate of 40Mbps (1Mbps=1024kbs). That will give you some idea of just how much quality has been squeezed out of those "HD" clips you have.

720p and 1080p don't stand for much when the clips have had the shit kicked out of them by lowering the bitrate.

Rapier · 8th August 2013, 14:53

but I heard somewhere (don't know if correct) that bitrate is just theoretical issue. because for human eye, you won't see a difference bettween higher and lower

alexora · 8th August 2013, 22:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapier

but I heard somewhere (don't know if correct) that bitrate is just theoretical issue. because for human eye, you won't see a difference bettween higher and lower

Check out this Wikipedia entry.

OddBa11 · 10th August 2013, 06:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapier

but I heard somewhere (don't know if correct) that bitrate is just theoretical issue. because for human eye, you won't see a difference bettween higher and lower

You are likely confusing bitrate and framerate.

framerate would only apply for like gaming.

bitrate is the amount of data in the image. If you have a shot glass of beer and a pitcher of beer, could you tell the difference?

Pad · 11th August 2013, 00:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapier

but I heard somewhere (don't know if correct) that bitrate is just theoretical issue. because for human eye, you won't see a difference bettween higher and lower

Quote:

Originally Posted by OddBa11

You are likely confusing bitrate and framerate.

framerate would only apply for like gaming.

bitrate is the amount of data in the image. If you have a shot glass of beer and a pitcher of beer, could you tell the difference?

OddBa11 is correct. Bitrate can and will make a massive difference to quality. Click on the two thumbs below to expand the pics so that you can see the change in quality. The first is a screenshot from a movie with a bitrate of just over 5000Kbs, the second is a screenshot the same frame from the same movie which has been re-encoded a 950Kbs.

While I would consider the first one HD by p0rn standards it isn't really close to real HD - simply because of the bitrate.

perubu · 11th August 2013, 04:44

I have never worked with HD but for standard DVD or TV rips I think a bitrate between
2500-3000 is the best. You don't really see any difference above that. 500 looks like
old youtube clips.

7th August 2013, 06:42	#2
OddBa11 Registered User Forum Lord Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,043 Thanks: 505 Thanked 1,551 Times in 717 Posts	They isn't likely any noticeable difference between the two depending on how it's displayed. They are the same resolution. The file size differences are a result of the codec used. Why not download both and test for yourself?

7th August 2013, 08:39	#3
Pad Fan of Cairy Hunt Postaholic Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Alice's Restaurant Posts: 5,094 Thanks: 19,424 Thanked 22,651 Times in 4,130 Posts	Ultimately you'll have to download both versions and compare - but I would think that the first file would be better quality as it has a higher bitrate of 2048kbs vs. 1600kbs for the smaller. A lot will depend on what you are using to view it - a crappy 7 year old monitor like mine or a proper HD TV. Having said that, I would comment that even the first file doesn't really have true HD specs - 2048kbs is a very low bitrate for HD. A lot of sites claim to be offering HD when they aren't at all because of the low bitrate encoding. Just consider that a Blu-ray disc (which is true HD) - has a max bitrate of 40Mbps (1Mbps=1024kbs). That will give you some idea of just how much quality has been squeezed out of those "HD" clips you have. 720p and 1080p don't stand for much when the clips have had the shit kicked out of them by lowering the bitrate.

8th August 2013, 14:53	#4
Rapier Junior Member Newbie Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 47 Thanks: 4 Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts	but I heard somewhere (don't know if correct) that bitrate is just theoretical issue. because for human eye, you won't see a difference bettween higher and lower

11th August 2013, 04:44	#8
perubu Northerner Clinically Insane Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Stockholm Posts: 2,008 Thanks: 3,954 Thanked 9,252 Times in 2,005 Posts	I have never worked with HD but for standard DVD or TV rips I think a bitrate between 2500-3000 is the best. You don't really see any difference above that. 500 looks like old youtube clips.