DigNap15

His scene with Cassandra Cruz

The things he does to her, are demeaning, but so sexy.
And I love the comments she makes (and her arse)
Pity about the cum shot.

__________________
Could I suggest that you backup all of your files to an external hard drive and store this offsite.

iLikeBigButtz

Mike Adriano hasn't got any good work. He ruins every scene he's involved in.

__________________

Shaolin_Prince

how come?

badpat

I'm not that negative but still only ambivalent about his work.

On one hand he gets the Top-A-Class of Pornstars commit to Anal, even those who never or seldomly did anal before, e.g. Candy Manson, Ariella Ferrera, Angelina Valentine... etc.
Technically the scene's are also well done, audio/video beeing professional, lightnig also.

On the other hand it's mostly POV-Style or Extreme-Closeups which gets boring pretty fast, and it also doesn't embrace those expensive A-Class-whores enough when can't see Candy's tits for 2/3 of the scene's.
Also the sex is "technical", altough most girls seem to like it.

recondo

great girls in his work. they do nasty things, get anal, lick ass, and slobber a lot. quality ingredients for top notch porn imo, I like the idea



but hes always jumping straight into licking a girls butt and focusing on it so much. she has a vagina, and not a prostate, he might do well to remember that a girl will find licking her out is more stimulating than just eating her asshole. hes also somewhat of a weirdo with his stupid speculum play


hes no more cheesy than your nacho, manuel, or anyone else. but his manners are second to his annoying camera work. and now the fish eyes camera trick was wonderfully done when the famous bang bro co. did it in the early 00s to build their company up, showing off naomi, gianna, and flower tucci for the masses. the twisting of camera views was only slightly done, and played up to the beauty of these women. but this adriano has overdone it, and apparently all he wants us to see is a distorted penis curving up into a hole. they dont show us enough of the woman. you get extreme focus face, a close up of her ass, then his dick




its not the best camera work. as a matter of fact, its bad. too much of a few diameters in range stretched out for the whole camera

DigNap15

I don't know if you guys have noticed but over the years main stream movies have gone closer up and closer up.

Look at a move in the 60's and you saw a whole bunch of people talking, now they just focus on one or two, or their face. TV shows are the same

I don't like that either.

But some closeups are good in porn, but I could not stand it if everyone movie was the same. I do like to see the woman's whole body.

__________________
Could I suggest that you backup all of your files to an external hard drive and store this offsite.

crm999

Great Buttman-style intro sequences, ruined by his obnoxious involvement.

And then the rest is totally killed when he does oral on the girl for half the scene. Who the hell wants to see another guy's big fat stupid face for 15 minutes?

The gape thing is just preference (not my thing), not the grossest thing out there.

Anadin

I'll just quote what I said about him in a previous thread


"I like the dude's style so much he's as close as I've ever come to downloading a scene solely because of the male talent. I love the angles he uses, doing his best to show of the ladies bodies and usually minimizing his exposure.



But I also love the fact that he loves the women he's working with and likes a fair bit of foreplay (Kissing, cunnilingus and even likes tits) something that so many male stars seem to strangely avoid. He's a bit of a freak though, loves spit and rimming a bit too much but other than that he's a genius to me."



Edit: Holy crap just realised how old this thread is

__________________

DigNap15

^
Great work!
Love those four animateds
Such dedication!

__________________
Could I suggest that you backup all of your files to an external hard drive and store this offsite.