28th October 2018, 13:51 | #3601 | |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 372
Thanks: 287
Thanked 871 Times in 292 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to lavicia For This Useful Post: |
28th October 2018, 15:21 | #3602 |
Registered User
Beyond Redemption Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 19,796
Thanks: 9,963
Thanked 86,400 Times in 16,165 Posts
|
|
28th October 2018, 17:39 | #3603 |
I Need More Sleep
Addicted Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 804
Thanks: 47,158
Thanked 2,164 Times in 653 Posts
|
Why do directors put themselves in scenes? I hate how you will have a great solo scene or hot intro to a video ruined by some yappy and/or grabby worthless excuse for garbage who just has to make his presence known. I hope every director that does or has done this gets gangrene in their penises and becomes a mute.
|
28th October 2018, 22:15 | #3604 |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 881
Thanks: 9,498
Thanked 2,333 Times in 742 Posts
|
Uhm, hardly. Br@zzers have Kieran Lee, Johnny ugly-as-Sins and Xander Hivplus to ruin the rest of their scenes as well.
One of my peeves are the performer-directors who feel the need to insert themselves as male "talent" in EVERY scene they direct. Like Mark Woods, Tony Ribas, Nacho cheese Vidal, Mike Adrianal... Basically these dudes are one-trick ponies whose every scene is a carbon copy of all previous ones. They are not directors; they are just filming themselves having sex. In fact, one of my major peeves is the belief, within the porn industry, that you can give any mope/pornstar a camera and thus make them a director. Some of these people (of course not all) don't have the first clue about angles or editing, and think that shaky, sideways footage (half of which is an extreme closeup of genitals sufficient for a gynecological/proctological examination) is what the average porn watcher wants to see while masturbating. In their defence, I assume they have spent so much time performing in porn, that it's been years since they have watched any and thus have no idea what good porn looks like. |
28th October 2018, 23:03 | #3605 | |
Mad Dog
Postaholic Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Lost Paradise
Posts: 8,422
Thanks: 37,663
Thanked 69,620 Times in 8,726 Posts
|
Quote:
Wouldn't have bothered me at all if they were offering their work of art (if we can even call it so) for FREE on their Tube channels. But, since we're talking about paying for watching Porn, here (and there are many people, around the world, who are not very tech-savy that still buy Br4zz3rs/LParking Premium memberships and expect and hope to see good Porn, someday ), there's no excuse to not reinvent or change direction and offer people more choices. Otherwise you can't blame piracy or people that choose to watch Amateur Porn for FREE to bust a nut, or getting wet together with their partners. Sometimes you have to stop for a moment, see how far you've gone. And, most importantly, be really critic about yourself and what you're doing. Only that will give you a new perspective and new ideas to reinvent yourself, your life and your work. I, if I only want to see gynecological/proctological closeups, I choose to watch what some many sexy and genuine couples put out there, for FREE. And that's not only me. That's also what many other Porn consumers are doing these days, who are tired of seeing prolapses, rough humiliations and female degradation. Not only some of these videos are professionally shot and edited, but they're also way more fun to watch for the genuineness and the whole couple talking. Porn, to be good, doesn't necessarily have to be rough or extreme. Even seeing just a sensual exotic beauty stripping in front of a camera, alone, with some really great camera work, cinematography and use of good filters, can make even the most desensitized person horny, somewhat. I'm amazed that D0rc3l still is going strong, with their own more sensual approach, despite all the bad degrading stuff that's been put out over the past 7 years, really. Why can't some of these newbies-wannabies directors won't listen to some people that complain about their $hitty-quality offerings, and won't even seek inspiration from directors who have been in the business WAY longer than them? I wonder.
__________________
Live and let live. Live and learn. Liberate your mind. Embrace knowledge.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SynchroDub For This Useful Post: |
29th October 2018, 00:34 | #3606 |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 881
Thanks: 9,498
Thanked 2,333 Times in 742 Posts
|
I fully agree. Sadly, most porn is made to look like a manic, ridiculous performance which looks like a parody of real sex. Add to that how many scenes are ruined by atrocious cinematography or excessive closeups. I can't count how many scenes I've watched recently which would have been so good, but every time it was looking good and I was really turned on, the director would fill the entire screen with a dick going in and out of a pussy.
Sigh. Now to fast-forward until I can see the womans' face again (which means I miss 3/4 of the scene). DUDES!!! We're not in bloody 1970. We believe that miss Emily Lee and mr Dick Viagrawood are having real sex on camera. We really do. No need to remind us every second. For fucks sake. While there are some studios which produce scenes with romantic sex rather than jackrabbit 500mph screwing, they too shower us with ridiculous closeups as well as shots of the guys' face. Seriously, I don't freak out if I see the mopes' face*, but is it too much to ask to always keep the girl in the frame? (*unless it is mr Pete or Chrisss Strokess in which case I delete the scene, burn my laptop and clean my eyes with bleach.) |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Kassidiaris For This Useful Post: |
29th October 2018, 02:13 | #3607 |
Junior Member
Novice
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2,813
Thanked 146 Times in 46 Posts
|
A minor annoyance: Women who smile at the camera after sex. Not easy to get off on a sexy model with a "say cheese" grin from ear to ear. sex is serious business to my way of thinking. And a shit-eating grin spoils the arousal. IMO
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mdffyx For This Useful Post: |
29th October 2018, 02:26 | #3608 | |
Junior Member
Novice
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2,813
Thanked 146 Times in 46 Posts
|
Unproductive prostates
Quote:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mdffyx For This Useful Post: |
29th October 2018, 02:37 | #3609 |
Junior Member
Novice
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2,813
Thanked 146 Times in 46 Posts
|
Ball snot? That sounds like something a man-hating militant lesbian would say.
Last edited by mdffyx; 29th October 2018 at 16:50.
Reason: looking for "funny" emoi.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mdffyx For This Useful Post: |
29th October 2018, 02:43 | #3610 |
Junior Member
Novice
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2,813
Thanked 146 Times in 46 Posts
|
how many of these tattoos are genuine? Hollywood makeup artists tattoo actors all the time with the fake, but real-looking, art.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mdffyx For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
|
|