17th April 2023, 14:53 | #171 |
Remaster Artist Extraordinaire
Forum Lord Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 753
Thanked 23,117 Times in 1,624 Posts
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ShagBuddy For This Useful Post: |
18th April 2023, 17:49 | #172 | |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 144
Thanks: 76
Thanked 236 Times in 108 Posts
|
Quote:
- http://iafd.com/title.rme/title...es+2/year=1998, with Mark Davis; - http://iafd.com/title.rme/title...s+23/year=1998, with Vince Vouyer; - http://iafd.com/title.rme/title...s+49/year=1998 and ...s+50/year=1998, two-parter with Randy West. I watched the last a long time ago, and thought they looked outstandingly pretty - especially compared to other porn-twins, and quite unlike in their iafd profile pics. Then again, the file was so lo-quality that I didn't really trust my eyes then and don't really trust my memory now. Ordinarily, I'd never make a such a request without supplying a source, but given that you say you already have a lot of twins content, and that I have close to zero experience with SD porn in general, I reckon making an exception may be in order in this case. Cheers! |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cellestial For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 15:00 | #173 |
Remaster Artist Extraordinaire
Forum Lord Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 753
Thanked 23,117 Times in 1,624 Posts
|
I have a question for you all... I am currently working on cleaning up an old Jayden Jaymes scene and the first half of the video is just her walking around in public, a little flashing, etc. Nothing serious. The second half is where all the action is.
The first have of the video (with her just out in public) is total garbage quality. Compression artifacts like crazy and just ugly in general. But the second half, with the action, is much better quality. In this type of situation I am torn between trying my best to clean up the garbage first half and include it OR simply cutting out the garbage part. I am sure there are people who would want the full original video, and others who dont give a crap about the non-action parts. What would be your preference? Include the ugly part or cut it out and reduce file size? |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ShagBuddy For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 15:50 | #174 |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 144
Thanks: 76
Thanked 236 Times in 108 Posts
|
^ A good compromise would surely be to work only on the portion(s) that you find worthwhile, and to provide the rest separately, as-is. That way, you're not wasting effort, downloaders aren't forced to waste disk space - and those who want all the footage there was, for OCD-related or whatever other reasons, are happy as well.
In other words, think like the retailers who bundle the main feature with deleted scenes, no matter that the latter may lack post-production but a greater or lesser extent. And in the exceedingly unlikely event that the quality of the filler material really does greatly matter to someone, they can still come here and request it explicitly, after all! |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cellestial For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 16:50 | #175 | |
Remaster Artist Extraordinaire
Forum Lord Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 753
Thanked 23,117 Times in 1,624 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ShagBuddy For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 17:51 | #176 |
Lamenting Sativa Rose
Postaholic Join Date: May 2012
Location: Between Sativa's lips...
Posts: 7,721
Thanks: 14,271
Thanked 13,013 Times in 2,725 Posts
|
You are not wrong. Legit, some of the best tits in porn, EVER. To be honest, she's a a bit tame, or shy or something, but damn, Audrey's tits are memorization. Those sweater puppies leave me in a trance. It's a shame she never outgrew that timidness, in her somewhat short/small career. Roughly a third of her IAFD page is compilations.
More of Audrey, if you have some, please. Thank you.
__________________
Want some decent wallpapers? Click the signature below.
RIP Tootsie22 - 3-11-19 - Gone but not forgotten |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ViceLikeEye For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 21:07 | #177 |
Junior Member
Newbie Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 49
Thanks: 530
Thanked 99 Times in 33 Posts
|
I guess I know what scene you talking about)) if encoding the whole scene will make 'action scene' worse (because you need to do settings for both part of scene) than i vote for cut it. if it doesnt matter than do not cut it - there are many programms that can easy cut mp4 mkv etc without reencoding
|
The Following User Says Thank You to azlea.anti For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 23:51 | #178 | |
Remaster Artist Extraordinaire
Forum Lord Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 753
Thanked 23,117 Times in 1,624 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ShagBuddy For This Useful Post: |
19th April 2023, 23:55 | #179 |
Remaster Artist Extraordinaire
Forum Lord Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 753
Thanked 23,117 Times in 1,624 Posts
|
The easy part is doing the upscales. The hard work is organizing it all and posting it.
10 requested scenes being posted. http://veterperementour.ru/showthrea...5#post24358725
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ShagBuddy For This Useful Post: |
20th April 2023, 00:52 | #180 |
Junior Member
Newbie Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 22
Thanks: 7,600
Thanked 81 Times in 20 Posts
|
I think editing out the introductory bits (especially when long) is warranted. Especially so with some of those older videos outside that always look rough. I've been using Lossless Cut a ton lately to do exactly that. Really saves a lot of space and is extremely fast/efficient. Sometimes those plot/chat/whatever scenes are half the video, so it really adds up.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to joenook For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
|
|