Best and Worst Fake Boobs, Fake Tits Before & After

[brosaph1000]

for instance: http://veterperementour.ru/showpost.p...&postcount=254
Such a shame! unto the incredible Zuz(Susanna Spears......aka, Zuzana Spears / Susana Spears / Susanna Miller / Zuzana Majarova) for getting fake breasts....there used to be nothing fake about her beauty. If someone in her circle of advisors told her it would be in her best interest to get surgery to enhance her perfect female anatomy.....shame on them and they should be fired.......If it was her idea........You WERE perfect Ms. Zuzana Majorova, in many of our opinions.

[fyb.monster]

Its the norm among pornstars to get breast enhancements these day.

Personally, I wouldn't even be interested in a model who has less than a C cup. One exception to that rule, she has a pretty face =/

Apparently, we men have such high expectations of women in terms of appearances that they have to resort to such surgical enhancements for perfection. Though they can be aesthetically pleasing with clothes on, without out, it looks like someone just bolted on a bigger size breast on top of it. Its truly a shame and a pity.

[Entropy]

As long as they look good, they look good.

However, that's not to say sometimes the implants aren't a downgrade. I love Soma Hernandez (made a thread for her) because she is just perfect. Small boobs, yes, but they fit her small body. I can't describe exactly what she has, but she has it.

When she got the implants, it just looked odd. It looks like a pair of rubber gag boobs on a barbie doll, or a weeble wobble. She is still attractive and can take dick like most men take air, but I prefer her natural beauty and sadly, those days are forever gone.

[totalauk]

Daisy Marie comes to my mind! She did get one "recently" ib the terms on how long she has been in the business! Maybe that is it? When they reach a special age, they are no longer so interestning for some in the business! And maybe they feel that there is lesser jobs around because of the age! If you see "older" pornstar, that has been in the business a long time, almost everyone have implants!
In the case of Daisy Marie, she had nice breast before the job!
But i Brandi Lyons began also very early in the business, on iafd site it says that she started around 1999 and is still active! Or it says until 2009! And she have in the terms of the business small boobs. But she did very early say she would not get implants, and she has kept her word! Big respect to her!
But she is among those very very too sad few off the natural girls!
But Daisy did that, that is a shame! but that business is very hard, and there is a lot of reason why the implants grows with the time in that business!
Natural is BEST!
Best regards

[BigOneOne]

The list of women who should never have gotten implants is absolutely identical with the list of women who got implants. Implants:

a) never look good
b) destroy the natural beauty of a girl
c) demage their careers

I am quite sure that if you make a top-ten list of the most popular and most earning pornstars 8 of them are going to be all natural.

There is no such thing as a good boobjob. There are just the bad ones and the catastrophic ones and in the rare cases where they seem to be good you can bet your ass that they are still worse then the breasts looked before the implants.
This law is also known as the BigOne-Doctrine. "There is no before/after-photo where the after looks better!"

[killallhippies]

all of them. with the exception of women who get them because they lost their real ones i just don't see how they're right. besides, it's not the size of breasts that matters. it's how they look. see devon who was big not long ago. her implants were retarded because she was a small women who looked ridiculous with the softballs she had inserted in her obviously natural a or b cup tits.

it's all about proportion. petite chicks look good with tiny titties and thick chicks look best with nice big ones. that's science, yo. trust me.

[Entropy]

Originally Posted by BigOneOne

The list of women who should never have gotten implants is absolutely identical with the list of women who got implants. Implants:

a) never look good
b) destroy the natural beauty of a girl
c) demage their careers

I am quite sure that if you make a top-ten list of the most popular and most earning pornstars 8 of them are going to be all natural.

There is no such thing as a good boobjob. There are just the bad ones and the catastrophic ones and in the rare cases where they seem to be good you can bet your ass that they are still worse then the breasts looked before the implants.
This law is also known as the BigOne-Doctrine. "There is no before/after-photo where the after looks better!"

That's not 100% true, I doubt you ever would have heard of the Big Three of the 90s, Jenna Jameson, Asia Carrera, Racquel Darrian, if they hadn't gotten their boobs done. Jenna's are the most obvious (and biggest), whilst Racquel was more of a lift and reshaping. Carrera, however, had practically no boobs and if it gave her ore confidence it worked miracles. There are such things as good boob jobs, but they apparently died with the 90s because all post 2000 jobs are skin stretching scar ridden pepperoni nipple fuck ups.

[loxsuom]

I always enjoyed McKenzie Miles - her new boobs are terrible.

[baddfingerz]

Dude...I L O V E big titties, but c'mon...



A girl should bounce at least a millimeter or two when she runs, no? Imagine the distress of a hungry newborn trying to deal with that. I think many guys would not even find such a synthetic woman arousing after banging her a few times.

[baddfingerz]

I can't give you a literal translation, but I know
the guy on the left is a plastic surgeon