|
![]() |
Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Sex & Porn Discussion Adult topics. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fantoma
Posts: 830
Thanks: 6,002
Thanked 4,357 Times in 691 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() The reason modern porn can be seen as boring is the lack of good direction by talented directors who actually care about making any semblance of art.
You see all movies (Well, most movies) are forms of art in one way or another. The difference between an average director and a great director is a great director always sees what works and what does not work. Film is a tricky thing. Sometimes you have to be shown something that is not true to real life in order to believe it. All aspects of film do this. Punches in real life don't sound like they do in the movies, time passes at different speeds during action scenes, real food looks terrible on camera whereas fake food and paint looks fantastic. The point is real talent is fooling the audience, 100% of the time, since movies are always using actors and sets and are all fantasy, or interpretations of real events using a fantasy medium for education. Reality shows and documentaries are in a different league. So here's my point; porn. Porn is film depicting people in the act of sex. Now with what I just told you, what seems like more work, and what seems lazier? Option A) Creating a dynamic scene in which characters can emote without dialog, based on body language alone, that is so engrossing the watcher really wishes he/she were there. Option B) Getting two people, whom have fucked many times before, to fuck once on camera and calling it a day. This is the sin that modern porn falls into. It isn't a SCENE, it's practically a home video of people fucking. We all know when WE fuck it's actually pretty boring compared to humping in a fighter plane with your hair on fire. They try to make up with this by adding in some hardcore aspects, really beating the shit out of the women because probably people don't do that, and if they don't do that, they haven't seen it. Well, by now we've seen it, it still spells one word: Lazy. Think how easy it must be to just get a girl fucking, focus on her vagina being penetrated, and leave the camera on a coffee table while you get lunch. Where are the changes in camera angles? Where is the dynamic lighting? Where are the appropriate zooms that don't overstay their welcome? This is not art not is it a fantasy of any kind. This is just two rabbits mating for hours on end. They say less is more. If you eat a cupcake once a year, I'm sure cupcakes are the ultimate in pleasure food. If you eat a cupcake every minute, guess how sick you're going to get. To wit, when the directors don't shove it in your face, and you DO only get small glimpses of what you want to see, it's that much more interesting. You should not be able to fast forward through a scene and miss nothing. You SHOULD want to drop everything and be captivated by it. Here's an example of a softcore scene that can't rely on penetration shots, and thus cannot hold on a penetration shot for several minutes. Excuse the quality, it's the only one I could find streaming. http://badjojo.com/2283421/nikki...t-biker-chick/ http://badjojo.com/2470525/nikki...biker-chick-2/ Compare it to this scene: http://badjojo.com/2449937/carme...leather-boots/ Alright, both scenes rely on the same initial hook: The chick is wearing a hot outfit. However, Nikki wins because she's not naked to begin with. Carmella starts with her pussy on display. Wow, now my interest is really peaked. I wonder what else that I've ALREADY SEEN could I possibly continue to see more of? Let me keep watching. So then a guy sits on the couch with Carmella and she immediately starts sucking him off. She teases him a little bit with the tongue, yeah, but the rest is all mechanical. The shot of Nikki bent over at the waist with that nice thong straddling her curves while her hair cascades over her shoulders is much more erotic and interesting. Sure, I would like to see a cock in her mouth, but the fact that I can't makes me want to watch more in the hopes I'll see something I haven't seen yet. Then Carmella sucks him slowly until I'm bored out of my mind. Again, my imagination works wonders for Nikki because I can't see it; maybe she's sucking him into the next goddamn dimension. Maybe she's doing it slow with lots of tongue. Whereas the bloomed lighting environment and steady camera angle never leaves Carmella's face and I see every detail. The totally silent atmosphere does nothing for me, either. I rather like that rocking 90s guitar. So then Nikki takes off her panties and it's hot seeing them come down, whereas Carmella has none to begin with so it's not interesting at all. What kind of a stripper walks out onto the stage naked? Nikki's nicely trimmed pubes come into view and she starts moving those nice hips and playing with her hair, then looking like she's getting into it, with mixtures of moans, o-faces, and kissing the guy. What the fuck does Carmella do? Hops on him for a minute, then assumes three positions in which she doesn't even have to move and keeps her big fucking mouth open the entire time saying OH YEAH, YEAH! Look at Nikki when she's riding him on that bike. Look how into it she is, and she isn't even being penetrated (AND is making far, far less money than Carmella Bing, sadly). Plus they're on a fucking motorcycle. Not only is that cool, and interesting, and rare, but it's also legitimately difficult. That bike could have fallen over at any second, just because the sex was simulated doesn't mean the danger wasn't. Fucking on a couch in a perfectly lit room with no rhyme or reason besides 'we're here' is no more interesting than me sitting on a couch. Also notice in Nikki's scene no words are spoken, but it still speaks volumes more than the other one. Hmm, I wonder how they accomplished that. Perhaps an actual director with actors who give a shit. Perhaps. I mentioned strippers, and they're a good example. Again, one doesn't rely on penetration shots. This is a real offender. See if you can even spot the strip in this entire video: http://badjojo.com/645304/sweet-...fucks-n-sucks/ Compare it to Nikki Nova at her best: http://badjojo.com/78223/nikki-nova-in-solo-sex/ Any sane person wouldn't even put those in the same category. I've seen this with the 'striptease and fuck' series, as well; sometimes it's just put them in a slutty outfit and they take it off in two seconds. Even amateur videos are better than that. I could go on, but that has been my view on the industry for some time. Substance, goddamnit, substance!
__________________
Last edited by Entropy; 1st October 2011 at 16:55.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Entropy For This Useful Post: |
|
![]() |
#2 |
V.I.P.
![]() Clinically Insane Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 9,630
Thanked 12,851 Times in 3,733 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Wow!
Is that your university thesis ! ? I'll have to read it sometime.....
__________________
Could I suggest that you backup all of your files to an external hard drive and store this offsite. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|