|
![]() |
Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Vintage & Classic [Pre-July 1995] Full Movies. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Forum Lord Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 0
Thanked 598 Times in 135 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() .
Last edited by cyberdyne; 24th April 2007 at 12:05.
We're all ears. Feel free to leave your comments, suggestions and even constructive criticisms for us here. The more of your thoughts we hear, the more we can improve the site. If we don't know about it, we can't help. Thank you for your continued support and great posts. ====== DO NOT MAKE REQUESTS IN THIS THREAD Requests go here. Requests posted in this thread will be deleted without warning. . . . |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#2 | |
Forum Lord Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 0
Thanked 598 Times in 135 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Films produced prior to that date are not covered by the 'U.S. 2257 article' (Record keeping requirements)
Last edited by cyberdyne; 25th April 2007 at 19:51.
Quote:
Hope that answers your question. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 900 Times in 45 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I'm very new here- and I like this forum A LOT. I have a question, and I'm not sure if this is the appropriate area to post it- so please forgive my ignorance, if so. Recently, I've finally hunkered down, and seriously started to transfer my vhs collection to digital. Some transfers are really good- but the majority suffer from what I call "annoying tracking lines". I understand that most, if not all, of the older movies were encoded for 640 x 480, and a standard digital transfer recodes to 720x480 (NTSC). (My standard method of transfer is Sony VCR > Sony video 8 firewire > pc>Windvd for initial digital av file.) My question is this: is there ANY filter or program that will crop out the very top and bottom of the movie pre or post render that will either eliminate or reduce this white noise? I've been editing, and such, since 1998 on my pc, and I must confess I'm still a slave to the tools I'm most comfortable with; WinDVD2 Creator, Dazzle Movie Maker, Pinnacle Studio 9.0, and Nero 8.0. Perhaps someone could usher me into this milennium with some suggestions of new programs to try? Thank you in advance.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
To Share and Collect
![]() Clinically Insane Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 3,136
Thanks: 3,765
Thanked 26,234 Times in 2,244 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() The white line at the bottom will always be there - it's in the nature of the VHS to digital transfer.
You could I suppose try some tracking adjustment prior to capturing, though this may worsen the result. Never actually did this myself though; having said that, I wouldn't bother much if I were you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 900 Times in 45 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I'm finding more and more that newer posts from newer posters post movies that are watermarked either by the company's web site, or by the person who ripped it. Though I'm grateful for the postings, watermarks are a very big distraction to the quality of the movie as a whole. I simply request that as a new rule- any watermarked clips or videos should be clearly identified as in the description of the movie above the links. End of my rant. Thank you.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Mobster
![]() Clinically Insane Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,915
Thanks: 24,567
Thanked 31,788 Times in 3,246 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
understand why it's done, yet still wonder about the mentality of a sharer who's so determined to make sure everyone knows 'who' that there are no qualms about providing a rip that's lower in quality than it needs to be.... The web site watermark is a different issue, SB; not sure it's reasonable to ask a poster to remove a watermark from a clip they've grabbed. But adding it when it isn't there seems unnecessary, to say the least. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 900 Times in 45 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Hmmmm...
Addicted Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 266
Thanks: 3,628
Thanked 4,819 Times in 217 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Well, you can remove them (using the delogo filters provided by programs like Avidemux or VirtualDub) but you have to do it in full processing mode, which takes it's time. But you probably already know about these. I found several good delogo plugins for VirtualDub, allowing me to "paint" the delogo area pixel by pixel instead of the usual square border. Delogo area gets a lot smaller this way. Myself, I always use these filters whenever I see any logos in a movie or clip I want to post.
I share your and scrubs dismay at those logos. They really can ruin a clip/movie. Don't want to count how many times what would have been great moments in a picture got obfuscated by a big bold square logo... But a rule about mentioning this kinda "censorship"? I think 90% of posters would still "forget" to mention these things. Probably would never work. Besides, you'll find an uncensored version anyway, sooner or later... I haven't seen many logos done by the rippers themselves. The only one that comes to mind right now is Epstyl from monsterboobs. But, considering how fast his rips end up on all forums around the globe, I somehow understand why he's doing it. If anyone feels like he must let the whole world know he did it, and permanently at that, he still can create a unique title at the beginning of the movie and leave it at that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Novice
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 900 Times in 45 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ahem- if you "honestly" think Epstyl is ripping his clips- and NOT just chopping up other peoples movies from the torrent networks- o-k dokeee, but I've talked to a few posters at VFE who are P'od because that "DOUCHE" has just chopped scenes from their rips to keep his blog full. And I LIKE his blog- he has good taste and the quality is excellent. But PLEASE don't try to convince me that those are his rips....AND he get's the title of DOUCHE because of the gaul he has to watermark the clips in which he has NO right to claim any sort of ownership- whatsoever. If you didn't shoot it, produce it, or f*ck in it- it aint yours- period. And I agree with you- creating a unique beginning at the start of the clip is fine, and doesnt take away from the movie at all. But as a forum rule- why not just request out of courtesy, that you add 1 extra line stating that the movie is "marked"? BTW - I'm new to using VDUB, so your advice/hints wee very helpful. Thanks,
Smut
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Hmmmm...
Addicted Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 266
Thanks: 3,628
Thanked 4,819 Times in 217 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Can't keep anyone from reuploading files anyway. If someone makes a rip from a rip, at least it won't cause any problems with the original uploaders files, if links go down. I have enough porn on VHS and DVD to keep on posting forever without ever having to do anything but my own rips. But if I want to do continual work on, say, a stagnating actress thread, I will have to consider doing rips from other peoples movies as well, sooner or later. To me, how it's done makes the difference. Full processing mode takes up time, and with filters added, creates something new compared to a simple direct stream copy. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|