Help Me Understand something... AI / Not AI?

[Easymuse]

OK ... So I’m having this tiny difficulty. Maybe youse guys here can help me.

A while ago I asked who these MILF babes were ... and you told me they were AI generated. OK ... I don’t see or understand that but I believe you. THEN ... a little while after that I get called out by a s-mod for posting a “CGI, Virtual Woman” in a thread not allowing those pics. I had NO fucking clue, but I didn’t argue. Now in the last coupla days I ran across a pic that sure did look, to my untrained eyes, like an AI pic. ... WTF. I KNOW it CAN’T be an AI pic because that wouldn’t have been allowed.

Can youse guys gimme some help here PLEASE?!?

Here are the pics in order of my post: (pic that fooled me, pic I was called out on, pic I’m confused about)

TIA.

[ossoduro]

..

the third picture is some IG model called Alexandra Taranova, so unfortunately its legit
(i agree it looks fake ass at 1st and 2nd sight, mostly lots of editing involved)



(im not good at explaining things in english over the internet, and this is possibly not the correct thread to discuss things further, but yeah, the two grannies are AI, and the 2nd chick looks like a videogame, hope the mod went easy on you )

Originally Posted by Easymuse

OK ... So I’m having this tiny difficulty. Maybe youse guys here can help me.

A while ago I asked who these MILF babes were ... and you told me they were AI generated. OK ... I don’t see or understand that but I believe you. THEN ... a little while after that I get called out by a s-mod for posting a “CGI, Virtual Woman” in a thread not allowing those pics. I had NO fucking clue, but I didn’t argue. Now in the last coupla days I ran across a pic that sure did look, to my untrained eyes, like an AI pic. ... WTF. I KNOW it CAN’T be an AI pic because that wouldn’t have been allowed.

Can youse guys gimme some help here PLEASE?!?

Here are the pics in order of my post: (pic that fooled me, pic I was called out on, pic I’m confused about)

TIA.

[Easymuse]

.




As per the slight tiny issue I had with the posting of the “CGI, Virtual Woman” ... I did say that I didn’t argue. I was only given a “warning”. Therein is why I was asking. How the fuck do you know these things?!? Is there some kinda way to check?!? WTF in general.

[Gwynd]

Originally Posted by Easymuse

.




How the fuck do you know these things?!? Is there some kinda way to check?!? WTF in general.

'Sarah Jordan' is a well known AI Instagram star - and her name's to the right of her head in your image:

http://womenfitness.net/sarah-jordan/

Then you have to understand we've had a lot of practice, - most staff here have been staring at images of 'natural' and 'semi-natural' women, day after day, for years.
At least with the grannies - there's an element spotting the obvious (or if you prefer 'the missing') - you can hide signs of aging from pretty much most of the body with surgery - except for the hands (which is probably why they don't really show the hands) as you get older your skin loses elasticity - 'grannies' should not have skin that smooth around the neck/collarbones (unless photoshopped, or AI); the swimsuits fit too well around the waistline, the lighting looks 'too neatly reflective' for the material - individually these things may not be enough to say 'definitely AI' but when they all appear (or not in some cases) in the same image - it's pretty much sufficient.


Having said that, in all honesty, I would have assumed the third image was from a PC game (plenty of the 'models' in the 2D/3D games threads have similar looks) - with younger people it's sometimes harder to tell, particularly if they use photoshop or some modern make-up trends.

The only thing would have made me doubt it's AI would have been a close-up look at this bit, because the joints look more 'natural' than AI normally manages, and the fold in the dress form a 'pattern' - for some reason AI tends to make the folds 'individual'
Give AI time and I'm sure it will be almost impossible to tell the difference.



In my case, it probably also helps that I follow someone on Twitter/X who although she is a real person - all of the images she posts are AI created by one of the other 2 women she forms a triad with (I have far less conviction that they are real people, they may well be alter egos she's created to get the thirsty men away.)

[SynchroDub]

If it was for me, this whole AI "trend/facade" would've ended with a clap.
There's nothing really "revolutionary" in it (at least for amateurish/art creation/money making purposes.......different thing for medical/military uses), and it only promotes "artistic laziness".

You wanna make good art that stand out (whether it is a movie, book or just a photo album), you gotta make it the old fashioned way and with the right tools.
That's my 2 cents on this whole AI trend.

As far as recognizing a real photo from an AI-generated one, look at the hands details and facial features.
If you notice anything "wrong" or unnatural, then you can be sure that's a fake AI-generated picture.

[rbn]

Most of studios will have a logo on their photos.
That's an easy way to filter out CGI vs Real Women.

[Easymuse]

OK ... So I've STILL got NO fucking clue. AI or REAL?!?

(a) (b)
(c)


The (a) and (c) faces look identical. The fingers on the (b) pic look fake.

[SynchroDub]

Originally Posted by Easymuse

OK ... So I've STILL got NO fucking clue. AI or REAL?!?

(a) (b)
(c)


The (a) and (c) faces look identical. The fingers on the (b) pic look fake.

AI.
First things first: the images look way too compressed and pixelated to be actual photos taken with a proper camera. They look like someone has shot them with a potato camera from the 90s, instead of a true HQ/HDR camera.
Then notice how her nails looks on picture b (way too unnatural to be real), and her left leg being smaller than the right one, with her foot that looks "prosthetic"?
The water, also, near the bridge, looks like someone has put a blue "patch" on it, rather than having that natural shadow/reflection effect.
Also, on picture a, you can clearly see her right hand fingers being different than those of her left hand.
Picture c also has its problems, too: the noticeable one being the sun reflections on her left arm, that look like someone has bumped up the brightness levels, instead of looking like actual sun rays.

Yep, it's all AI.
Nothing's real on those photos.