Go Back   Free Porn & Adult Videos Forum > Vintage & Classic > Vintage & Classic
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Notices

Vintage & Classic [Pre-July 1995] Full Movies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 24th April 2007, 04:55   #1

Forum Lord
 
cyberdyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 0
Thanked 598 Times in 135 Posts
cyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Good
Exclamation Comments / Suggestions / Questions / Criticisms

.
We're all ears.

Feel free to leave your comments, suggestions and even
constructive criticisms for us here.
The more of your thoughts we hear, the more we can improve the site.
If we don't know about it, we can't help.

Thank you for your continued support and great posts.


======

DO NOT MAKE REQUESTS IN THIS THREAD

Requests go here.

Requests posted in this thread will be deleted without warning.

.
.
.
Last edited by cyberdyne; 24th April 2007 at 13:05.
cyberdyne is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to cyberdyne For This Useful Post:

Old 25th April 2007, 19:53   #2

Forum Lord
 
cyberdyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 0
Thanked 598 Times in 135 Posts
cyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Goodcyberdyne Is Damn Good
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destray View Post
any particular reason July 1995?
Films produced prior to that date are not covered by the 'U.S. 2257 article' (Record keeping requirements)

Quote:
...........Some of the aforementioned depictions appearing or otherwise contained in or at this site contain only visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made before July 3, 1995, and, as such, are exempt from the requirements set forth in 18 U.S.C. 2257 and C.F.R. 75. With regard to the remaining depictions of actual sexual conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at this adult site, the records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2257 and C.F.R. 75 are kept by the custodian of records of this company whose address is available public information.......
...yada, yada.....

Hope that answers your question.
Last edited by cyberdyne; 25th April 2007 at 20:51.
cyberdyne is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cyberdyne For This Useful Post:
Old 5th April 2009, 09:16   #3
Novice
 
Smutbroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 902 Times in 45 Posts
Smutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn Good
Default

I'm very new here- and I like this forum A LOT. I have a question, and I'm not sure if this is the appropriate area to post it- so please forgive my ignorance, if so. Recently, I've finally hunkered down, and seriously started to transfer my vhs collection to digital. Some transfers are really good- but the majority suffer from what I call "annoying tracking lines". I understand that most, if not all, of the older movies were encoded for 640 x 480, and a standard digital transfer recodes to 720x480 (NTSC). (My standard method of transfer is Sony VCR > Sony video 8 firewire > pc>Windvd for initial digital av file.) My question is this: is there ANY filter or program that will crop out the very top and bottom of the movie pre or post render that will either eliminate or reduce this white noise? I've been editing, and such, since 1998 on my pc, and I must confess I'm still a slave to the tools I'm most comfortable with; WinDVD2 Creator, Dazzle Movie Maker, Pinnacle Studio 9.0, and Nero 8.0. Perhaps someone could usher me into this milennium with some suggestions of new programs to try? Thank you in advance.
__________________
Smutbroker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Smutbroker For This Useful Post:
Old 5th April 2009, 12:06   #4
To Share and Collect

Clinically Insane
 
physics6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 3,136
Thanks: 3,765
Thanked 26,238 Times in 2,244 Posts
physics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a Godphysics6 Is a God
Default

The white line at the bottom will always be there - it's in the nature of the VHS to digital transfer.

You could I suppose try some tracking adjustment prior to capturing, though this may worsen the result.

Never actually did this myself though; having said that, I wouldn't bother much if I were you.
physics6 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to physics6 For This Useful Post:
Old 30th April 2009, 13:04   #5
Novice
 
Smutbroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 902 Times in 45 Posts
Smutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn Good
Default Water Marks...

I'm finding more and more that newer posts from newer posters post movies that are watermarked either by the company's web site, or by the person who ripped it. Though I'm grateful for the postings, watermarks are a very big distraction to the quality of the movie as a whole. I simply request that as a new rule- any watermarked clips or videos should be clearly identified as in the description of the movie above the links. End of my rant. Thank you.
__________________
Smutbroker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Smutbroker For This Useful Post:
Old 30th April 2009, 14:43   #6
Mobster

Clinically Insane
 
scrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,915
Thanks: 24,567
Thanked 31,791 Times in 3,246 Posts
scrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a Godscrub Is a God
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smutbroker View Post
I'm finding more and more that newer posts from newer posters post movies that are watermarked either by the company's web site, or by the person who ripped it. Though I'm grateful for the postings, watermarks are a very big distraction to the quality of the movie as a whole. I simply request that as a new rule- any watermarked clips or videos should be clearly identified as in the description of the movie above the links. End of my rant. Thank you.
A-fucking-men.

understand why it's done, yet still wonder about the mentality of a sharer who's so determined to make sure everyone knows 'who' that there are no qualms about providing a rip that's lower in quality than it needs to be....

The web site watermark is a different issue, SB; not sure it's reasonable to ask a poster to remove a watermark from a clip they've grabbed. But adding it when it isn't there seems unnecessary, to say the least.
scrub is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to scrub For This Useful Post:
Old 30th April 2009, 15:57   #7
Novice
 
Smutbroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 902 Times in 45 Posts
Smutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn Good
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scrub View Post
A-fucking-men.

understand why it's done, yet still wonder about the mentality of a sharer who's so determined to make sure everyone knows 'who' that there are no qualms about providing a rip that's lower in quality than it needs to be....

The web site watermark is a different issue, SB; not sure it's reasonable to ask a poster to remove a watermark from a clip they've grabbed. But adding it when it isn't there seems unnecessary, to say the least.
Agree scrub - there's nothing that can be done by that; But my example is this: Just downloaded full version of buttman's euro vaction #2- Excellent quality. I was excited- till i unrared- and it has a huge RoccoSiffredi.com logo in the lower right corner. I'm not complaining- I love the movie; but as a courtesy- it should be noted beforehand that this is EXACTLY what you are getting. What would it take- like 2 extra seconds- to type "watermarked with blah-blah.com" in the description? I know a lot of people are sharing their "VOD" files- and I appreciate the time and effort of them zipping, uploading, then posting: BUT they are still providing (...in my opinion) an inferior quality rip (watermark)- vs someone who posts a video from their own collections; the quality may not be super- but it gives us something to work with if we choose to try to clean it up. Watermarks can not be removed.
__________________
Smutbroker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Smutbroker For This Useful Post:
Old 30th April 2009, 21:21   #8
Hmmmm...

Addicted
 
AmGe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 266
Thanks: 3,628
Thanked 4,821 Times in 217 Posts
AmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a God
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smutbroker View Post
... Watermarks can not be removed.
Well, you can remove them (using the delogo filters provided by programs like Avidemux or VirtualDub) but you have to do it in full processing mode, which takes it's time. But you probably already know about these. I found several good delogo plugins for VirtualDub, allowing me to "paint" the delogo area pixel by pixel instead of the usual square border. Delogo area gets a lot smaller this way. Myself, I always use these filters whenever I see any logos in a movie or clip I want to post.

I share your and scrubs dismay at those logos. They really can ruin a clip/movie. Don't want to count how many times what would have been great moments in a picture got obfuscated by a big bold square logo... But a rule about mentioning this kinda "censorship"? I think 90% of posters would still "forget" to mention these things. Probably would never work. Besides, you'll find an uncensored version anyway, sooner or later...

I haven't seen many logos done by the rippers themselves. The only one that comes to mind right now is Epstyl from monsterboobs. But, considering how fast his rips end up on all forums around the globe, I somehow understand why he's doing it.

If anyone feels like he must let the whole world know he did it, and permanently at that, he still can create a unique title at the beginning of the movie and leave it at that.
AmGe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AmGe For This Useful Post:
Old 30th April 2009, 22:07   #9
Novice
 
Smutbroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: planet "errph"
Posts: 68
Thanks: 233
Thanked 902 Times in 45 Posts
Smutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn GoodSmutbroker Is Damn Good
Default

ahem- if you "honestly" think Epstyl is ripping his clips- and NOT just chopping up other peoples movies from the torrent networks- o-k dokeee, but I've talked to a few posters at VFE who are P'od because that "DOUCHE" has just chopped scenes from their rips to keep his blog full. And I LIKE his blog- he has good taste and the quality is excellent. But PLEASE don't try to convince me that those are his rips....AND he get's the title of DOUCHE because of the gaul he has to watermark the clips in which he has NO right to claim any sort of ownership- whatsoever. If you didn't shoot it, produce it, or f*ck in it- it aint yours- period. And I agree with you- creating a unique beginning at the start of the clip is fine, and doesnt take away from the movie at all. But as a forum rule- why not just request out of courtesy, that you add 1 extra line stating that the movie is "marked"? BTW - I'm new to using VDUB, so your advice/hints wee very helpful. Thanks,
Smut
__________________
Smutbroker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Smutbroker For This Useful Post:
Old 1st May 2009, 12:28   #10
Hmmmm...

Addicted
 
AmGe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 266
Thanks: 3,628
Thanked 4,821 Times in 217 Posts
AmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a GodAmGe Is a God
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smutbroker View Post
ahem- if you "honestly" think Epstyl is ripping his clips- and NOT just chopping up other peoples movies from the torrent networks...
Thanks for the info. Didn't want to "convince" anyone about anything. Guy simply came to mind because he seems to be the only one really doing these "watermarks", and regularily at that. Then again I don't have any issues with people doing scene rips from other people's movie transfers under certain conditions. If the original poster hasn't posted any scene extractions after a reasonable amount of time it's allright be me if someone else does it. If the reposter does something silly, like making a copy of a scene in full processing mode just to leave a unique watermark, well, seems like a dumb thing to do IMHO, but it's his own time he wastes on it.
Can't keep anyone from reuploading files anyway. If someone makes a rip from a rip, at least it won't cause any problems with the original uploaders files, if links go down.
I have enough porn on VHS and DVD to keep on posting forever without ever having to do anything but my own rips. But if I want to do continual work on, say, a stagnating actress thread, I will have to consider doing rips from other peoples movies as well, sooner or later. To me, how it's done makes the difference. Full processing mode takes up time, and with filters added, creates something new compared to a simple direct stream copy.
AmGe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to AmGe For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:31.




vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
(c) Free Porn

Online free porn at mobile phone


princess diana pornstarsweaty armpits fetishsexy pics of dolly partonjean jacobs porndaniella rush sexbobbi eden picsfelicity fey picjayden james planetsuzykinzie kenner picturescandance von pornrachel roxxx smart pussytera patrick sex picsshane diesel cock size3d rpg sex gamesamteur sex picskim chambers squirtrachael leigh cook sex scenesalyson hannigan porn videosplanetsuzy.org iranwwe diva porn videokira queen planetsuzysexy Paola Rios @ planetsuzy PATM pictures lupe fuentes porn picvicky vickers pornlilly kingston creampieeroge rpg gamesjennett mccurdy pornleilani lee.netkarma rosenberg forumjenny pussinmichelle barrett gangbangexotica soto galleriesmayhem pornamy locane toplesskylie wilde squirtkandy kuntvalerie dodds videosnina hartley sex scenesalexandra tydings pornvanessa cage handdominationtraci lords boobsmalia love pornkelly stafford vidsnikki sims porn videomelina perez porn videohitomi tanaka unsencoredleah remini fakelindemulder janineabigaile johnson forumjenni lee porn galleriesjenna fischer fake pornkelly karloff porn videos for mobile downloadhanna hilton midwest affairmckayla mendezcorin riggs pussybrooklyn chase planet suzynastiest porn site eversister jerkoff instructioncasey cummzDR FAKENHOUSER free mp4porn sexpress story &imagevideos de erica brandssook yin lee videosveronica simon analjillian murray in bikinimistressrhiannonabby titmuss pornkayden kross implantsfelony taking it to the streetstara reid body shotdemi mawby nudezeta jones sex videoshannon elizabeth nude sexmitzi martin pornhayden winters nudevista