Online free porn at mobile phone

pelham456 · 25th April 2021, 22:01

how does one instruct google to search on EXACTLY WHAT U SPECIFY? for a long time i have noticed it more interested in displaying popular NEAR MISSES than on actual results. case in point, i tried searching for the one-word name "bradward" the other day (came up in a lower decks episode), only to find the results swamped with "brad ward"s.

putting bradward in quotes significantly improved things, but there were still a lot of "brad ward"s mixed in. shouldn't the quotes be weeding those out ENTIRELY?

moreover, adding a minus sign up front never seems to filter things out the way one expects. half the time it seems like it's ADDING the term to the search. and it doesn't seem to work on multiple-word strings in any case (e.g., adding " -'brad ward' " to the above searches.

i sometimes see searches with a plus-sign added. what exactly does this do? what's the diff betw searching on "vaccine", say, and "+vaccine"?

Gwynd · 25th April 2021, 22:12

Type 'word' into google.
When results appear, along the top are a series of options.
Select 'settings'
Select 'Advanced Search.'
Put 'word' into 'this exact word or phrase' box

Et viola, the first result for 'word,' when the 'word' is 'bradward' is now:

Code:

http://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Bradward_Boimler

The '+' is, or at least used to be used, to search Google+ pages, or positive blood groups - it's been years since I've used Google.

alexora · 25th April 2021, 22:57

Also, if in advanced search you also pot the word 'ward' in the 'none of these words' field, you should avoid returning results for "Brad Word".

pelham456 · 26th April 2021, 03:18

oh, hang on, i think quotes were indeed sufficient. all of the "brad ward"s now mixed in have the one-word "bradward" somewhere on their page -- as nickname, URL, twitter handle, etc. so "exact word" under advanced search (and "verbatim" under tools?) is actually redundant. (not to mention redundant to each other!)

still, there is something materially diff betw "loose search" vs "exact search" and "keep this string together" -- quotation marks' purported role. why are they changing ANYTHING when wrapped around a one-word string?

25th April 2021, 22:01	#1
pelham456 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 4,354 Thanks: 1,236 Thanked 4,862 Times in 2,334 Posts	google too loose how does one instruct google to search on EXACTLY WHAT U SPECIFY? for a long time i have noticed it more interested in displaying popular NEAR MISSES than on actual results. case in point, i tried searching for the one-word name "bradward" the other day (came up in a lower decks episode), only to find the results swamped with "brad ward"s. putting bradward in quotes significantly improved things, but there were still a lot of "brad ward"s mixed in. shouldn't the quotes be weeding those out ENTIRELY? moreover, adding a minus sign up front never seems to filter things out the way one expects. half the time it seems like it's ADDING the term to the search. and it doesn't seem to work on multiple-word strings in any case (e.g., adding " -'brad ward' " to the above searches. i sometimes see searches with a plus-sign added. what exactly does this do? what's the diff betw searching on "vaccine", say, and "+vaccine"?

25th April 2021, 22:12	#2
Gwynd Perfect Stranger Postaholic Join Date: May 2010 Location: The land of the Brotherhood Posts: 9,430 Thanks: 145,323 Thanked 62,814 Times in 9,163 Posts	Type 'word' into google. When results appear, along the top are a series of options. Select 'settings' Select 'Advanced Search.' Put 'word' into 'this exact word or phrase' box Et viola, the first result for 'word,' when the 'word' is 'bradward' is now: Code: http://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Bradward_Boimler The '+' is, or at least used to be used, to search Google+ pages, or positive blood groups - it's been years since I've used Google. __________________ Are you a new member here? If so, please read this. If you don't know how to use vBulletin, The FAQ is here. If you want to know about PlanetSuzy, or you need help, please go here. Thank you for reading this message, please enjoy your time at PlanetSuzy. Last edited by Gwynd; 25th April 2021 at 22:25. Reason: Adds

25th April 2021, 22:57	#3
alexora Walking on the Moon Beyond Redemption Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 30,980 Thanks: 163,452 Thanked 152,650 Times in 28,690 Posts	Also, if in advanced search you also pot the word 'ward' in the 'none of these words' field, you should avoid returning results for "Brad Word". __________________ SOME OF MY CONTENT POSTS ARE DOWN: FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AND I'LL RE-UPLOAD THEM

26th April 2021, 03:18	#4
pelham456 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 4,354 Thanks: 1,236 Thanked 4,862 Times in 2,334 Posts	oh, hang on, i think quotes were indeed sufficient. all of the "brad ward"s now mixed in have the one-word "bradward" somewhere on their page -- as nickname, URL, twitter handle, etc. so "exact word" under advanced search (and "verbatim" under tools?) is actually redundant. (not to mention redundant to each other!) still, there is something materially diff betw "loose search" vs "exact search" and "keep this string together" -- quotation marks' purported role. why are they changing ANYTHING when wrapped around a one-word string?