|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Computer and Tech Help Discuss hardware, software, applications, malware removal, etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
22nd January 2013, 09:19 | #1 |
Registered User
Forum Lord Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,810
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 8,412 Times in 1,675 Posts
|
Seagate vs. MS
Just wanted an opinion-just finally got an external HD to back up my system. Just haven't decided whether to use Seagate's back-up program (called Dashboard) or Microsoft's native program. I know it's going to be a lengthy process as I currently have about 800 GB of material and only a 2.0 USB. Only curious as I hate installing new programs. The new drive holds 2TB.
Thanks
__________________
Use the "THANKS" button if you like this post! |
|
23rd January 2013, 05:46 | #2 |
Registered User
Forum Lord Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 508
Thanked 1,697 Times in 795 Posts
|
The Win7 native program, simply backs up the OS and installed software I believe. It can be used to restore you system to the state that it's in when the backup is created.
For misc data, such as movies, pics, documents, and such, I would back them up separately. You should also have more than one copy of anything important. If you are using a desktop PC, I would suggest an internal HDD for regular backups. It will be much faster and you will be more likely to consistently create backups. Then use the external as a second copy created less frequently. External drives have a high failure rate, typically the result of "accidents" (ie: dropped, improperly disconnected, power outages, or just failure from being on all the time). |
23rd January 2013, 08:48 | #3 |
Fan of Cairy Hunt
Postaholic Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Alice's Restaurant
Posts: 5,154
Thanks: 19,782
Thanked 22,959 Times in 4,188 Posts
|
I use FreeFileSync to back up to my external hard drives. It is pretty easy and intuitive to use. I set it to "Mirror" rather than "Synchronise" as I use my externals exclusively for backup. The first run will take a bit of time, but after that if you run it on a daily basis it wont take long at all.
You can set it up to exclude individual folders, files, or file types if you want. The only downside to it I can see is that it copies the content of one disc to another exactly - it does not compress data like some backup programs. That doesn't bother me as storage is so cheap these days. And in a lot of ways having an exact copy is simpler if you run into problems. I have found retreiving data from compressed backup archives somewhat difficult and confusing in the past - especially if incremental backups have been created. As it's name suggests it is free so you've got nothing to lose in taking a look at it. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pad For This Useful Post: |
24th January 2013, 05:42 | #4 |
Registered User
Forum Lord Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 508
Thanked 1,697 Times in 795 Posts
|
Compression will vary based on file type. Items such as pictures, music, and movies won't compress (at least not enough to matter).
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OddBa11 For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
|
|