Online free porn at mobile phone

4SL69XLT · 12th June 2011, 02:34

^debrid services + jdownloader.
I use real-debrid: 81 hosts available for 3€/month

alexora · 14th July 2011, 03:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karmafan

You waste your time complaining about the different file hosts. Filesonic and Oron pay the bills here so PS is not about to drop them because you get crappy download speed.

For some reason that you may consider bizarre, it would appear that complaining does work, and that PS will drop hosts because members get crappy download speeds:

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryO

Since allowing Uploaded.to on 1st May, 2011, we have received complaints from non-premium downloaders in several countries about poor access and progressively slower downloading speeds. We reviewed the performance of Uploaded.to and agree; the host should be discontinued.

Starting 18th July, 2011 at 00:01 GMT, new Uploaded.to links no longer will be permitted. At that time we will permit new links hosted by Uploading.com. We will re-evaluate the performance of Uploading.com after 30 days.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

Since you obviously disapprove of complaints, you should publicly write to LarryO (in the same way as you publicly wrote against complainers) and let him and all of us know how disappointed you are to see him yield to complainers...

Bottom line that can be understood by all, is that complaining works: let your voice be heard, fellow members and don't let yourselves be bullied into "not rocking the boat"!

Maxell_02 · 14th July 2011, 11:08

Users can always express their opinion and that is OK. But that can not be understood too seriously because in most cases they not objective at all. Reasons are mainly personal. Lack of knowledge or even hatred to any filehost will force them to write nonsense.

There must be someone ''on the top'' who will examine that on one professional way. Without emotions, winding, or even interest

But if it depends on users votes then i'm almost sure - there is no filehost who will survive poll and stay like allowed host here.

And by the way ... is that necessary ?? To ban any filehost ?? Whatever ... at the end, i guess various interests will always win. As usual.

-SunRise- · 14th July 2011, 18:20

alexora, I can't imagine how could the speeds of uploaded be crappy, at least in comparation with uploading's. I get above 100 kb/s at uploaded and about 30-40 kb/s at uploading. Also, wait time 12 sec. at uploaded and 1 minute at uploading. I tried to download a file of 1GB from uploading and didn't succed. First two times download suddenly stoped, without any reason. The third time in browser the DL speed was showing 150kb/s, but it was slower than 40, cause 1MB was loading minutes. I didn't encounter such problems at any other host before...

However, what I wanted to say is that i really enjoyed uploaded and it was better than fs and many others, that's it

alexora · 14th July 2011, 19:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by -SunRise-

alexora, I can't imagine how could the speeds of uploaded be crappy, at least in comparation with uploading's.

I wouldn't know: I never tried either of them. My point was that members complained, and as a result Uploaded.to was banned.

Basically, I was saying that complaining does work, so those you are unhappy about Vilesonic (or any other host) show complain, and complain loudly.

-SunRise- · 15th July 2011, 01:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexora

I wouldn't know: I never tried either of them. My point was that members complained, and as a result Uploaded.to was banned.

Basically, I was saying that complaining does work, so those you are unhappy about Vilesonic (or any other host) show complain, and complain loudly.

I understand you perfectly. I am not any filehost hater, FS is also one of the greatest, but uploaded was even better. One of the reasons I like to download from filehosts is just because it's funny and I enjoy it and ul.to was one of the hosts which could provide this joy. Now I should complain about the complaints of ul.to and try to get it back

but I'm sure it won't be back...

pychoscot · 15th July 2011, 19:47

Oh Joy! so Uploaded.to gets banned which for UK users is one of the better free services with good speeds! and is replaced by Uploading.com one that is on the IWF block list and is utterly useless to UK users most of the time! Yet fucking "M"Oron remains! the ONLY bloody host this site should be banning is ORON! GET A GRIP PEOPLE!

Maxell_02 · 16th July 2011, 00:27

Well ... I agree with most of what you said but ... you need to chill down

Your situation in UK will remain unchanged with or without Oron. Even if they ban Oron right now, who will be next - Filesonic ? Who will remain

? Noone i guess.

alexora · 16th July 2011, 01:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxell_02

Even if they ban Oron right now, who will be next - Filesonic ?

Now that would be what I call a result!!

Maxell_02 · 16th July 2011, 01:15

Yes, i know that Alexora. Your not satisfy without ''good ban''

15th July 2011, 19:47	#37
pychoscot Registered User Addicted Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 822 Thanks: 3,143 Thanked 2,563 Times in 688 Posts	Oh Joy! so Uploaded.to gets banned which for UK users is one of the better free services with good speeds! and is replaced by Uploading.com one that is on the IWF block list and is utterly useless to UK users most of the time! Yet fucking "M"Oron remains! the ONLY bloody host this site should be banning is ORON! GET A GRIP PEOPLE! __________________ I AM THE MASTER OF THE CLIT. REMEMBER THIS FUCKING FACE. WHENEVER YOU SEE CLIT, YOU'LL SEE THIS FUCKING FACE

12th June 2011, 02:34	#31
4SL69XLT Registered User Addicted Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 372 Thanks: 141 Thanked 1,820 Times in 317 Posts	^debrid services + jdownloader. I use real-debrid: 81 hosts available for 3€/month

14th July 2011, 11:08	#33
Maxell_02 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 3,455 Thanks: 5,514 Thanked 10,032 Times in 2,486 Posts	Users can always express their opinion and that is OK. But that can not be understood too seriously because in most cases they not objective at all. Reasons are mainly personal. Lack of knowledge or even hatred to any filehost will force them to write nonsense. There must be someone ''on the top'' who will examine that on one professional way. Without emotions, winding, or even interest But if it depends on users votes then i'm almost sure - there is no filehost who will survive poll and stay like allowed host here. And by the way ... is that necessary ?? To ban any filehost ?? Whatever ... at the end, i guess various interests will always win. As usual.

14th July 2011, 18:20	#34
-SunRise- Registered User Novice Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 72 Thanks: 181 Thanked 677 Times in 67 Posts	alexora, I can't imagine how could the speeds of uploaded be crappy, at least in comparation with uploading's. I get above 100 kb/s at uploaded and about 30-40 kb/s at uploading. Also, wait time 12 sec. at uploaded and 1 minute at uploading. I tried to download a file of 1GB from uploading and didn't succed. First two times download suddenly stoped, without any reason. The third time in browser the DL speed was showing 150kb/s, but it was slower than 40, cause 1MB was loading minutes. I didn't encounter such problems at any other host before... However, what I wanted to say is that i really enjoyed uploaded and it was better than fs and many others, that's it

16th July 2011, 00:27	#38
Maxell_02 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 3,455 Thanks: 5,514 Thanked 10,032 Times in 2,486 Posts	Well ... I agree with most of what you said but ... you need to chill down Your situation in UK will remain unchanged with or without Oron. Even if they ban Oron right now, who will be next - Filesonic ? Who will remain ? Noone i guess.

16th July 2011, 01:15	#40
Maxell_02 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 3,455 Thanks: 5,514 Thanked 10,032 Times in 2,486 Posts	Yes, i know that Alexora. Your not satisfy without ''good ban''