|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Forum Help Tutorials and tips. Post any problems or bugs with the forum. |
|
Thread Tools |
4th April 2013, 02:41 | #341 | |
Sea shanties,
and wet panties! Clinically Insane Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,446
Thanks: 20,010
Thanked 79,645 Times in 3,427 Posts
|
Quote:
[img]http://****************/images/eyeofsauron.jpg[/img]
__________________
Credit to all original posters, scanners, cappers, sites, etc.
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Boatguy70 For This Useful Post: |
4th April 2013, 02:49 | #342 |
Devil's Choir
Postaholic Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9,734
Thanks: 63,471
Thanked 67,932 Times in 9,412 Posts
|
Well, if you have mod rights in a section, then you can mark your own posts. But if it's somewhere else, other mods have to do it. It's not a matter of trust, really-- it's just automatic.
VIPs are usually very trustworthy and don't make a lot of mistakes, but just like anyone, they do at times. |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to SaintsDecay For This Useful Post: |
4th April 2013, 04:03 | #343 |
Mobsterette and Mistress of Mayhem
Postaholic Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here and there and probably somewhere else.......
Posts: 6,609
Thanks: 37,293
Thanked 44,655 Times in 5,796 Posts
|
There would be issues with either increasing post count for certain usergroups in certain sections of the forum even though there is an option for this.
When that option is enabled, it adds an extra query for the DB with every post made. If you take a look at the average posts per day and allow that number to increase, those extra DB queries put a much larger load on the forum servers. The servers have enough trouble keeping up with things as it is when you consider the sheer amount of posts and searches going on here each day by the total amount of users online which is can get quite high at times. Also, when you consider that number of posts made in 24 hours and take into account the number of mods here who have to check each and every one of those posts, the numbers are pretty overwhelming as it stands right now (I know, been there done that ) So the settings are set where they are for very good reasons and I don't imagine any changes would be made at this point. Sorry to tell you, but this is the only way to keep things under control. I've seen it when it was out of control and it wasn't pretty |
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to jenny48549 For This Useful Post: |
4th April 2013, 04:34 | #344 |
Sea shanties,
and wet panties! Clinically Insane Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,446
Thanks: 20,010
Thanked 79,645 Times in 3,427 Posts
|
None of that makes any sense to me Jenny as you'd simply be moving existing users from one group to another. I.E. no extra server/DB load, and I know (first hand) that it works elsewhere. But... I'll take your word for it.
Enjoy your evening my dear.
__________________
Credit to all original posters, scanners, cappers, sites, etc.
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Boatguy70 For This Useful Post: |
4th April 2013, 14:44 | #345 |
Mobsterette and Mistress of Mayhem
Postaholic Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here and there and probably somewhere else.......
Posts: 6,609
Thanks: 37,293
Thanked 44,655 Times in 5,796 Posts
|
I was addressing increasing restrictions on post counts by section, not an auto-promotion scheme from Junior Member to Registered User. This could be done automatically by post count only, but the forum software does not distinguish whether the posts made are within the rules or not. You could end up with members being auto-promoted who have made a large number of posts that do not conform to the forum rules and that could raise havoc in sections like PATM. In the environment that we have today, where most new registrants are only interested in getting as many links up as they can without regard to the posting rules, any sort of auto-promotion type scheme would not work at this forum unfortunately.
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to jenny48549 For This Useful Post: |
4th April 2013, 19:27 | #346 |
Sea shanties,
and wet panties! Clinically Insane Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,446
Thanks: 20,010
Thanked 79,645 Times in 3,427 Posts
|
Well put/stated. I've made a nuisance of myself with this question with a couple of the other mods/admins. Nothing against them, but you're the first to give me an excellent, detailed explanation as to why it wouldn't fly here, and it's much appreciated Jenny.
Thanks very much.
__________________
Credit to all original posters, scanners, cappers, sites, etc.
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Boatguy70 For This Useful Post: |
22nd April 2013, 11:00 | #347 |
AllYourPornAreBelongToUs
Clinically Insane Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Juso, Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 173,135
Thanked 8,849 Times in 2,052 Posts
|
I would implement a post censure filter at PATM (and other sections if appropriate).
It automatically checks if a post has required information, and if it does not, rejects the post with an error message to tell the poster what is wrong. Until the post comes to have all the necessary info, the post will not be accepted. By implementing the filter, a post standardization (a post template) should be established. Some posts tell only "23 min" as duration, but these post will be rejected since the filter checks if a post contains a string either "##:##:##" or "## min ## sec" or "## minutes ## seconds" or other variations. Some posts uses not correct character in duration such as "##;##" and "##.##" instead of "##:##" These post will be rejected too. Other file info: file type, dimension, size is also checked by matching a template strings such as "###x###" or "###X###" for dimension. Also, the filter checks if required host link is included and if it is within the limit of the rule. The good thing is... without any cost on moderators side, posters have to learn whatever appropriate way of writing their posts. By implementing the filter, all mods have to do is... to check if a post 1) has an appropriate thumbnail (because the filter cannot see how many cuts are included) 2) has an appropriate title 3) is a duplicate post of previous posts or not 4) has inappropriate message text or not besides required info and that would significantly reduce the workload of moderators so that they could more and more focus on these important tasks, especially on 2) providing an accurate title and 3) busting duplicates, pouring more time resources.
__________________
My monumental project | My pet project | My best boobs collection TIPs: How to organize files and name files ID requests: Nikki Flames' totally mysterious scene | Mystery prego ID'd as Dulce! | Pavla, MILF. Need further info Jana or Mary? Need further confirmation |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to 山川智之 For This Useful Post: |
22nd April 2013, 11:42 | #348 |
AllYourPornAreBelongToUs
Clinically Insane Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Juso, Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 173,135
Thanked 8,849 Times in 2,052 Posts
|
Second thing.
I would create a whole title list for each... well not all, because it takes time... of PATM girls and maintain the list. It is not like the one I have been doing here. It is more comprehensive list based on all the existing database such as IAFD and others. It is more like what I did as mod for some of the girls. An example of the remains can be found here. Since now we are only allowed to post one post for a scene on a same host regardless of resolution at standard video PATM section, there must be only one link per host for a scene. And each post has to have at least one required host. That can make a list/table like... Title 1 [code ###]: [LS] [DF] Title 2 [code ###]: [LS] [DF] [HF] [MF] Title 3 [code ###]: [LS] [DF] [MF] Title 4 [code ###]: [LS] [HF] Title 5 [code ###]: [DF] [HF] [MF] Title 6 [code ###]: -> alt Title 3 Title 7 [code ###]: [LS] [DF] [MF] Title 8 [code ###]: [DF] Title 9 [code ###]: [LS] [DF] [HF] [MF] Title 10 [code ###]: -> alt Title 1 ...something like this. So, when you see an empty slot, you can post for the slot. Say, if you want to post Title 4, you can post it on [MF] and/or [DF] with/without other optional links. To make this happen, we need to do three things. 1. each scene/title has to have an individual code. This is because some films have exact same title. And some titles are a part of other titles. And some even do not have any title. 2. posters need to include the title code as well as real text title. This is because for a background table making script to understand what title is posted. So, there is no work for making the table on moderators side. That is script's job. 3. a poster has to report if a link in an existing post is dead and he is trying to post his in the empty spot, so that moderator removes the link and gives him the spot. This is the only job for moderators and they already do that job. One additional job is to edit the table and remove the link, which is not a big deal. In exchange of these changes, we can have completely comprehensive list of where to find the posts for the title and the host of your choice! Posters do not have to worry about posting duplicate contents even by mistake!! Posters can easily find whatever not posted on certain file host of their choice!!! What a wonderful PS?!
__________________
My monumental project | My pet project | My best boobs collection TIPs: How to organize files and name files ID requests: Nikki Flames' totally mysterious scene | Mystery prego ID'd as Dulce! | Pavla, MILF. Need further info Jana or Mary? Need further confirmation |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to 山川智之 For This Useful Post: |
22nd April 2013, 22:32 | #349 |
Registered User
Forum Lord Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Heaven
Posts: 1,590
Thanks: 18,784
Thanked 12,291 Times in 1,484 Posts
|
If I was head of PlanetSuzy I'd encourage everyone under me to try sleeping their way to the top.
__________________
Last edited by Big ALbert; 23rd April 2013 at 10:01.
"Too big, too strong, too fast, too good!!!"-Stacey King |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Big ALbert For This Useful Post: |
23rd April 2013, 14:39 | #350 |
V.I.P.
Clinically Insane Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pornland
Posts: 4,241
Thanks: 23,837
Thanked 17,810 Times in 3,826 Posts
|
山川智, seriously you should start your own iafd, it would be miles better as you have the patience to do it.
__________________
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HiTrack99 For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
|
|