Who is worst female pornstar?

[palo5]

Originally Posted by Urge0k

So let me get this straight! You find Sharon Mitchell to be on the repulsive-dykey side, but Lahaie, who could pass for her sister...

Oh no, dear colleague, Brigitte could never pass for her sister. You must be drinking

Brigitte is a paragon of beauty. She has everything Sharon doesn't - perfect bone structure, a beautiful face, fabulous skin, full breasts, gorgeous nipples, a narrow waist and wonderful hips giving her a perfect hourglass figure, a lovely vagina, the best legs anyone could wish for, great dress sense... and a brain

Whereas Sharon is ugly as Sin, flat as a brick, and probably only fit for freak shows. She's the female equivalent of Ron Jeremy

[Funkhouser]

Originally Posted by palo5

The Germans say you CAN argue about taste ("Über Geschmack kann man streiten")

I say the Germans win this round. If we can't argue about taste, we don't need this thread

One of the many things the Germans have been wrong about.

But, seriously, let's say I like the taste of apples better then oranges, while you like the taste of oranges better then apples. Which one of us is 'right' and which one of us is 'wrong?' Neither. It seems an obvious and simple point.

As for this thread, people waste time arguing and bs-ing about all sorts of stuff.

[Funkhouser]

Originally Posted by palo5

Whereas Sharon is ugly as Sin, flat as a brick, and probably only fit for freak shows. She's the female equivalent of Ron Jeremy

Does she owe you money? Did she give you the clap?

It is one thing to not find her attractive or think she is much less then that, but man...you are beyond that.

[Guru Brahmin]

Originally Posted by Funkhouser

Does she owe you money? Did she give you the clap?

Wrote him a bad check, it sounds like.

Originally Posted by palo5

a lovely vagina

If you were standing on a street corner next to a 6 foot vagina(the loveliest one on earth), you'd run like hell. That goes for a 6 foot penis, too. They call it "bumping uglies" for a reason.

[Pasko]

Originally Posted by palo5

The Germans say you CAN argue about taste ("Über Geschmack kann man streiten")

I say the Germans win this round. If we can't argue about taste, we don't need this thread

Germans have learned everything 'bout civilizations from latins.

[DoctorNo]

Originally Posted by Urge0k

If you were standing on a street corner next to a 6 foot vagina(the loveliest one on earth), you'd run like hell. That goes for a 6 foot penis, too. They call it "bumping uglies" for a reason.

I would run from a six-foot kitten too, but that doesn't mean they aren't adorable.

[palo5]

Originally Posted by Funkhouser

But, seriously, let's say I like the taste of apples better then oranges, while you like the taste of oranges better then apples. Which one of us is 'right' and which one of us is 'wrong?' Neither. It seems an obvious and simple point.

Not at all - the notion that we can argue means that we can debate, which means it's quite possible to reconcile views. Doesn't all life depend on it?

[palo5]

Originally Posted by Funkhouser

Did she give you the clap?

No, I've never been near her. But I'm not sure what happens to people who are

It is reported that she covered up an HIV infection of a prolific performer, which led to infections among other performers

How true it is, I don't know. Maybe our Mod Bill_Az can comment?

[palo5]

Originally Posted by Pasko

Germans have learned everything 'bout civilizations from latins.

In what way?

[Pasko]

Originally Posted by palo5

In what way?

They bring Germans acqueducts, roads, laws, coins... They seems nothing to you? By the way, I think we are a little off topic