Online free porn at mobile phone

sexyb3rry · 27th January 2010, 03:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceCrMn

Around 6-8 seconds.
Yeah, almost, nvidia driver is still a binary blob.So it's not compiled from source.Everything else is though.To get a complete KDE4 desktop built takes about 13 hours on my system.I've got an AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @ 3Ghz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, Gigabyte GA-M55SLI-S4 motherboard, and a pair of EVGA 8800 GTS 640MB graphics cards running in SLI.Not the latest or fastest, but still pretty good for all I need.

That's a pretty good system...

13 Hours???

Do you ever compile your own kernels?

You mind if I ever ask for help on compiling?

IceCrMn · 27th January 2010, 03:50

On Gentoo you must compile your own kernel.There are no binary kernels available through the package manager. There's a tool called "genkernel" to try and help automate the task.It will build a lot of modules that you probably won't ever need and ,of course, adds a lot of time to compile because of all the extras.This builds a more generic style kernel with an initrd.
Sure. I don't mind trying to help.

" 13 Hours??? " Build time is what keeps most people from source based distros.

sexyb3rry · 27th January 2010, 04:46

So, why do you use a source-based distro?

IceCrMn · 27th January 2010, 05:24

I like the cpu specific optimization mostly.Also, most linux software has options that can be enabled or disabled at compilation time.So I end up with more of what I want and less of what I don't.

sexyb3rry · 27th January 2010, 05:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceCrMn

I like the cpu specific optimization mostly.Also, most linux software has options that can be enabled or disabled at compilation time.So I end up with more of what I want and less of what I don't.

Yes, so I've read. Is it worth the time to compile everything from source?

I currently use Fedora12 and compile stuff every once in a while... today it was MOC (terminal music player), but never anything too big or complicated.
Not used to it either.

IceCrMn · 27th January 2010, 05:59

The speed difference can be very obvious for somethings.As far as time needed to build, well the faster your machine the less time needed.I was lurking around this thread, [thread]http://veterperementour.ru/t257263-p2-firefox-36.html[/thread] and I think that the Google V8 benchmark was the benchmark mister_playboy was talking about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mister_playboy

Windows Firefox in WINE scores higher on many benchmarks than native Linux Firefox.

So I tested my firefox build and came up with:
Score: 427
Richards: 1523
DeltaBlue: 130
Crypto: 1160
RayTrace: 302
EarleyBoyer: 326
RegExp: 175
Splay: 655

here I found an article with some numbers to use for comparison
http://tuxradar.com/content/brow...-linux-firefox

sexyb3rry · 27th January 2010, 07:09

I had no idea compilers affected the performance of the software!!!

Thanks for the link.

IceCrMn · 27th January 2010, 07:16

Your welcome.
Yes they can.Both ways.

GardoBardo · 12th March 2010, 06:36

ArchLinux this way

GardoBardo · 12th March 2010, 06:47

Well not so much if you ask me. Ok it's a little tricky the installation, but without a doubt it worth. I've tried Debian, Fedora & Mandriva before, and for me this is The Distro

: is fast, simple and very very stable.

p.s.

Oh, and it's 'bleeding-edge', without being something like testing

12th March 2010, 06:47	#20
GardoBardo Junior Member Newbie Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 21 Thanks: 193 Thanked 31 Times in 17 Posts	Well not so much if you ask me. Ok it's a little tricky the installation, but without a doubt it worth. I've tried Debian, Fedora & Mandriva before, and for me this is The Distro : is fast, simple and very very stable. p.s. Oh, and it's 'bleeding-edge', without being something like testing Last edited by GardoBardo; 12th March 2010 at 06:52.

27th January 2010, 03:50	#12
IceCrMn Junior Member Virgin Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 12 Thanks: 51 Thanked 29 Times in 11 Posts	On Gentoo you must compile your own kernel.There are no binary kernels available through the package manager. There's a tool called "genkernel" to try and help automate the task.It will build a lot of modules that you probably won't ever need and ,of course, adds a lot of time to compile because of all the extras.This builds a more generic style kernel with an initrd. Sure. I don't mind trying to help. " 13 Hours??? " Build time is what keeps most people from source based distros.

27th January 2010, 04:46	#13
sexyb3rry Junior Member Addicted Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: USA Posts: 265 Thanks: 905 Thanked 713 Times in 209 Posts	So, why do you use a source-based distro?

27th January 2010, 05:24	#14
IceCrMn Junior Member Virgin Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 12 Thanks: 51 Thanked 29 Times in 11 Posts	I like the cpu specific optimization mostly.Also, most linux software has options that can be enabled or disabled at compilation time.So I end up with more of what I want and less of what I don't.

27th January 2010, 07:09	#17
sexyb3rry Junior Member Addicted Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: USA Posts: 265 Thanks: 905 Thanked 713 Times in 209 Posts	I had no idea compilers affected the performance of the software!!! Thanks for the link.

27th January 2010, 07:16	#18
IceCrMn Junior Member Virgin Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 12 Thanks: 51 Thanked 29 Times in 11 Posts	Your welcome. Yes they can.Both ways.

12th March 2010, 06:36	#19
GardoBardo Junior Member Newbie Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 21 Thanks: 193 Thanked 31 Times in 17 Posts	ArchLinux this way