Online free porn at mobile phone

Links234 · 29th October 2009, 01:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by GodOfWhore

Interracial stuff. (Ethnic dude on White chick)

What about a White guy on an Ethnic chick?
Same complaint, or are we going to set a double-standard?
I'd rather see IR. At least I know there's no chance of it being incest.

TheBare · 29th October 2009, 02:09

[quote]

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepanalimpact

i just hate those japanese movies where they HAVE TO stuff things in chicks like half an hour AT LEAST. dildo, then vibrator, then licking, then injecting milk, then shaving, then fingering, then whatever...

You are forgetting the squid, octopi or is it octopusses..eels etc. they do not belong in there..even though it may smell slightly like the sea

Quote:

that aside, i really can't stand gagging scenes, it has nothing to do with sex, just freaking pointless.

The above always makes me gag as well. I'm glad we are in agreement

duckee · 1st November 2009, 18:43

With special emphasis on #5, 6, & 11; THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU, and god bless! unfortunately the repressed homosexual meatheads that you speak of (nothing against being gay, or having trouble coming to terms with it, but when one is so insecure about one's own sexual nature that you begin abusing and degrading the opposite sex to prove how straight you are to your nuckle dragging brethren I just cant help but imagine going at such a dickbrain with a tire-iron) are setting the standard nowadays for pornography and male sexual behavior in general. pretty much all you can do is sit back and hope natural selection takes its course (ladies, smarten up. Ultimately its up to you and we really dont need any more of their genes in the pool! Breed em out! if you dont believe me now you will later.) Anyway, its a relief to know there's anyone out there thinking the way you are, thanks for the post... and sorry for dropping my rant on you, got a little carried away there..

Darko_Lionking · 2nd November 2009, 02:24

WTF is wrong with Nerd today?

Fuckin mommys basement suckers !!!! All of you

thruster315 · 2nd November 2009, 03:29

I think one of the issues of porn now is that there is SOOO much of it.

Remember back when porn was so cool and sort of taboo? They actually had actresses (more so than actors) who could be a marquee name? Anyone remember when being a Vivid girl actually meant something?? Nowadays everyone is trying to be a name and yet all they're doing is still fucking on screen. C'mon people- it's not rocket science here. Sure there are niches like lesbian porn, gay porn, interracial, group play, etc. but back then they were unique. Now we have to stomach things like abusive porn and things that no one in their right mind would ever try in real life with their partner. There is no sense of reality to some of the flicks being put out now- it seems as though shock value and getting one's name out there is more important than giving us good quality erotic entertainment.

Of course porn is based upon one's fantasy but at least give us something we can relate to.

thruster315 · 2nd November 2009, 03:32

Are there even any individuals to speak of in porn any more or have they all become some homogenized generic blob of silicone or Viagra based sexual goo?

Ashkelon · 2nd November 2009, 08:59

Well said, tc315.

To paraphrase the illustrious Tom Servo:
What the Samuel Langhorne hell is wrong with porn today?

No love/affection. It's all fucking and cocksucking.

I'm all for vigorous intercourse and blowjobs, but there's never (that I've seen) the sense that the people involved feel anything more than pure selfish sexual lust toward one another. There's never (or virtually never) anything that's comprable to an explicit version of a movie love-scene. They rarely even kiss.

Then again, the genitals-obsessed camera work of the vast majority of porn doesn't appeal to me -- I'd rather see the woman, her O-face, her breasts jiggling, etc.

Mr. Peter North · 2nd November 2009, 15:03

Well said tc315, spot on with everything.

My first memories of porn were finding my father's hidden collection not long after I found the enjoyment of masturbation. Ginger Lynn was my favorite. But Tracey Adams, Nikki Charm, Jamie Summers, and Ashlyn Gere were up there too. It might have been my age, but these women looked and acted like women. God that was sexy. Plus, since porn was still a little taboo, none of these women were in it to get rich quickly, or because they wanted to go mainstream and thought sucking cock in a movie would help them get there. And as far fetched as the movie plots were, there was still a bit of realism in it, because there was at least an effort being made into doing some acting to try and sell the scene. Not to mention there was chemistry between the actors involved in the scene (it amazes me how you girls these days will let a guy cum on their face, but won’t kiss them). Maybe it was because it was such a smaller community, but you could feel the lust, and passion between the two, or three.

The 90’s came and so did the cable cheater box which made staying up late very, very enjoyable. The 90’s also brought us the first wave of surgically enhanced performers. Not that I minded at first. Nikki Tyler, Stacy Valentine, Jill Kelly, Dyanna Lauren, Julia Ann, what more can I say (although the last two’s “return” to porn has been thoroughly disappointing. Once great stars have been relegated down to nothing more then sell outs desperate far cash). The first time I saw Holly Body, well lets just say I went through a lot of Kleenex that night. But then silicone boobs and bleach blonde hair became the norm. Everyone had it and porn seemed to become quite generic. Everything started looking the same.

Then the 2000’s hit. Porn was big business now, and socially a lot more acceptable. It was cool to be a porn star, so everyone saw the quick buck and raced to California to get their name in lights. And just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, the invention of the internet, and worst of all, the Viagra pill, made every slim ball dude believe they could be a porn star. Now there is so much out there, in order to try and make your product sell, you need to be different. So we got an overwhelming supply of “niche” porn. Who could push the boundaries more. Plus, with the internet, people could buy and view porn without the embarrassment of going down to their local smut store and risk being seen renting/buying a film that degrades women.

The selection of women to be fans of is greater then it ever has. And I guess that’s a good thing. From fresh off the bus 18 year olds, to “mature” women who are in their 40’s. Something for everybody it seems. Although the labeling of women and videos is what bothers me. You’re not a “MILF” if you’re not old enough to have a son who’s friend is over to hang out with his buddy and you seduce him. You’re not a “Cougar” if you are still in your 20’s. You shouldn’t be in a “Just turned 18” film if you have been in the biz for 4 years and have been in a 100 or so films. It’s not a “Surprise Creampie”, we know she was well aware of what she was agreeing to do before she did it. MILF’s don’t “crave black cock”. Nobody believes the “loser” husband you have cast in “Please Bang My Wife” is actually married to the woman in the scene. It seems the insecurity of the people watching the porn is as high as the people producing it. The more you try to sell me on the product with what you have named it, the less I believe the girl you have staring in the scene was actually interested in doing it.

I guess it is truly “different strokes for different folks”, but I always used porn as a fantasy for myself. I wanted to see women I found hot, sexy, or beautiful, having enjoyable sex. The kind of sex I would want to have with them if given the opportunity. Most of my favorite stars were my favorites because they reminded me of a girl I knew, and that helped in my fantasy. Like tc315 said, an occasional slap, or spit, or dirty talk was good. But trying to choke a girl, or see if you could make her puke by ramming your cock down her throat doesn’t appeal to me. Is that what guys actually want to do with a woman they get back to their house? No wonder why they are such avid porn viewers, they can’t get a girl to actually talk to them.

But like I said, I don’t get the niche porn. So I would love for someone to explain the interest a straight guy has in seeing Double Penetration. Or Double Pussy Penetration. Or Double Anal Penetration. Or Double Blow Job. I’ve played sports for a long time, and been around plenty of naked men in the locker rooms. I’m secure in my manhood and sexual orientation, but I still have no interest in coming in sexual contact with another man’s penis. Why is insisting a girl takes it in the ass so important, and so necessary? Why as a white guy, do you want to see a black guy doing a scene? Why do guys buy movies because of who the male star is on the cover, while not caring about which females have been cast?

I use to laugh at people who said porn was degrading to women. I saw stars like Jenna Jameson, Tera Patrick and Jesse Jane become incredibly wealthy and incredibly famous by doing it their way. But now I’ve seen the porn that is out there. It can be very degrading to women.

Karmafan · 2nd November 2009, 22:24

I find if you want the good clean looking girls that you remember from early years or porn you have to go with Euro or Japanese girls. Most look like the hot girl next door you would love to fuck and still have a chance at them. if they have implants they are just enough to enhance the girl and not make her a cartoon Jessica Rabbit. Tattoos and piercings are also at a minimum. Girls like Monica Sweetheart, Jane Darling, Kristi Klenot, Terry Nova, Silvia Saint, and Karma Rosenberg (implants but not bgger then her head) are super hot and still "clean" looking.

thomaswendell · 5th November 2009, 15:07

What is wrong with Porn today?

Mmmmm Tats, Tats, Tats, Spitting, tats, fake tits, shaved bush, tats, body piercing, tats, fake lips, bad plastic surgery, tats and tats.

5th November 2009, 15:07	#190
thomaswendell Registered User Newbie Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 33 Thanks: 1,316 Thanked 80 Times in 25 Posts	What is wrong with Porn today? Mmmmm Tats, Tats, Tats, Spitting, tats, fake tits, shaved bush, tats, body piercing, tats, fake lips, bad plastic surgery, tats and tats. __________________ "If a redhead hasn't lit something of yours on fire at least once, she never loved you anyway."

1st November 2009, 18:43	#183
duckee Registered User Virgin Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2 Thanks: 204 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	With special emphasis on #5, 6, & 11; THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU, and god bless! unfortunately the repressed homosexual meatheads that you speak of (nothing against being gay, or having trouble coming to terms with it, but when one is so insecure about one's own sexual nature that you begin abusing and degrading the opposite sex to prove how straight you are to your nuckle dragging brethren I just cant help but imagine going at such a dickbrain with a tire-iron) are setting the standard nowadays for pornography and male sexual behavior in general. pretty much all you can do is sit back and hope natural selection takes its course (ladies, smarten up. Ultimately its up to you and we really dont need any more of their genes in the pool! Breed em out! if you dont believe me now you will later.) Anyway, its a relief to know there's anyone out there thinking the way you are, thanks for the post... and sorry for dropping my rant on you, got a little carried away there..

2nd November 2009, 02:24	#184
Darko_Lionking Registered User Forum Lord Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Germany Posts: 1,021 Thanks: 7,112 Thanked 9,275 Times in 846 Posts	WTF is wrong with Nerd today? Fuckin mommys basement suckers !!!! All of you

2nd November 2009, 03:29	#185
thruster315 V.I.P. Beyond Redemption Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: wherever you need me Posts: 71,114 Thanks: 209,470 Thanked 325,294 Times in 68,520 Posts	I think one of the issues of porn now is that there is SOOO much of it. Remember back when porn was so cool and sort of taboo? They actually had actresses (more so than actors) who could be a marquee name? Anyone remember when being a Vivid girl actually meant something?? Nowadays everyone is trying to be a name and yet all they're doing is still fucking on screen. C'mon people- it's not rocket science here. Sure there are niches like lesbian porn, gay porn, interracial, group play, etc. but back then they were unique. Now we have to stomach things like abusive porn and things that no one in their right mind would ever try in real life with their partner. There is no sense of reality to some of the flicks being put out now- it seems as though shock value and getting one's name out there is more important than giving us good quality erotic entertainment. Of course porn is based upon one's fantasy but at least give us something we can relate to.

2nd November 2009, 03:32	#186
thruster315 V.I.P. Beyond Redemption Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: wherever you need me Posts: 71,114 Thanks: 209,470 Thanked 325,294 Times in 68,520 Posts	Are there even any individuals to speak of in porn any more or have they all become some homogenized generic blob of silicone or Viagra based sexual goo?

2nd November 2009, 08:59	#187
Ashkelon Registered User Virgin Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 3 Thanks: 4,902 Thanked 13 Times in 2 Posts	Well said, tc315. To paraphrase the illustrious Tom Servo: What the Samuel Langhorne hell is wrong with porn today? No love/affection. It's all fucking and cocksucking. I'm all for vigorous intercourse and blowjobs, but there's never (that I've seen) the sense that the people involved feel anything more than pure selfish sexual lust toward one another. There's never (or virtually never) anything that's comprable to an explicit version of a movie love-scene. They rarely even kiss. Then again, the genitals-obsessed camera work of the vast majority of porn doesn't appeal to me -- I'd rather see the woman, her O-face, her breasts jiggling, etc.

2nd November 2009, 15:03	#188
Mr. Peter North Junior Member Newbie Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 44 Thanks: 27 Thanked 62 Times in 27 Posts	Well said tc315, spot on with everything. My first memories of porn were finding my father's hidden collection not long after I found the enjoyment of masturbation. Ginger Lynn was my favorite. But Tracey Adams, Nikki Charm, Jamie Summers, and Ashlyn Gere were up there too. It might have been my age, but these women looked and acted like women. God that was sexy. Plus, since porn was still a little taboo, none of these women were in it to get rich quickly, or because they wanted to go mainstream and thought sucking cock in a movie would help them get there. And as far fetched as the movie plots were, there was still a bit of realism in it, because there was at least an effort being made into doing some acting to try and sell the scene. Not to mention there was chemistry between the actors involved in the scene (it amazes me how you girls these days will let a guy cum on their face, but won’t kiss them). Maybe it was because it was such a smaller community, but you could feel the lust, and passion between the two, or three. The 90’s came and so did the cable cheater box which made staying up late very, very enjoyable. The 90’s also brought us the first wave of surgically enhanced performers. Not that I minded at first. Nikki Tyler, Stacy Valentine, Jill Kelly, Dyanna Lauren, Julia Ann, what more can I say (although the last two’s “return” to porn has been thoroughly disappointing. Once great stars have been relegated down to nothing more then sell outs desperate far cash). The first time I saw Holly Body, well lets just say I went through a lot of Kleenex that night. But then silicone boobs and bleach blonde hair became the norm. Everyone had it and porn seemed to become quite generic. Everything started looking the same. Then the 2000’s hit. Porn was big business now, and socially a lot more acceptable. It was cool to be a porn star, so everyone saw the quick buck and raced to California to get their name in lights. And just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, the invention of the internet, and worst of all, the Viagra pill, made every slim ball dude believe they could be a porn star. Now there is so much out there, in order to try and make your product sell, you need to be different. So we got an overwhelming supply of “niche” porn. Who could push the boundaries more. Plus, with the internet, people could buy and view porn without the embarrassment of going down to their local smut store and risk being seen renting/buying a film that degrades women. The selection of women to be fans of is greater then it ever has. And I guess that’s a good thing. From fresh off the bus 18 year olds, to “mature” women who are in their 40’s. Something for everybody it seems. Although the labeling of women and videos is what bothers me. You’re not a “MILF” if you’re not old enough to have a son who’s friend is over to hang out with his buddy and you seduce him. You’re not a “Cougar” if you are still in your 20’s. You shouldn’t be in a “Just turned 18” film if you have been in the biz for 4 years and have been in a 100 or so films. It’s not a “Surprise Creampie”, we know she was well aware of what she was agreeing to do before she did it. MILF’s don’t “crave black cock”. Nobody believes the “loser” husband you have cast in “Please Bang My Wife” is actually married to the woman in the scene. It seems the insecurity of the people watching the porn is as high as the people producing it. The more you try to sell me on the product with what you have named it, the less I believe the girl you have staring in the scene was actually interested in doing it. I guess it is truly “different strokes for different folks”, but I always used porn as a fantasy for myself. I wanted to see women I found hot, sexy, or beautiful, having enjoyable sex. The kind of sex I would want to have with them if given the opportunity. Most of my favorite stars were my favorites because they reminded me of a girl I knew, and that helped in my fantasy. Like tc315 said, an occasional slap, or spit, or dirty talk was good. But trying to choke a girl, or see if you could make her puke by ramming your cock down her throat doesn’t appeal to me. Is that what guys actually want to do with a woman they get back to their house? No wonder why they are such avid porn viewers, they can’t get a girl to actually talk to them. But like I said, I don’t get the niche porn. So I would love for someone to explain the interest a straight guy has in seeing Double Penetration. Or Double Pussy Penetration. Or Double Anal Penetration. Or Double Blow Job. I’ve played sports for a long time, and been around plenty of naked men in the locker rooms. I’m secure in my manhood and sexual orientation, but I still have no interest in coming in sexual contact with another man’s penis. Why is insisting a girl takes it in the ass so important, and so necessary? Why as a white guy, do you want to see a black guy doing a scene? Why do guys buy movies because of who the male star is on the cover, while not caring about which females have been cast? I use to laugh at people who said porn was degrading to women. I saw stars like Jenna Jameson, Tera Patrick and Jesse Jane become incredibly wealthy and incredibly famous by doing it their way. But now I’ve seen the porn that is out there. It can be very degrading to women.

2nd November 2009, 22:24	#189
Karmafan Who Cut The Cheese? Beyond Redemption Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 11,387 Thanks: 39,606 Thanked 38,110 Times in 9,853 Posts	I find if you want the good clean looking girls that you remember from early years or porn you have to go with Euro or Japanese girls. Most look like the hot girl next door you would love to fuck and still have a chance at them. if they have implants they are just enough to enhance the girl and not make her a cartoon Jessica Rabbit. Tattoos and piercings are also at a minimum. Girls like Monica Sweetheart, Jane Darling, Kristi Klenot, Terry Nova, Silvia Saint, and Karma Rosenberg (implants but not bgger then her head) are super hot and still "clean" looking.