Online free porn at mobile phone

Audiobully · 2nd February 2011, 17:11

I thought the New York Post revealed that Sting was signed to a one year deal with the WWE, but that cannot be confirmed. I will almost be disappointed if it is Taker. What would be beyond badass is for Taker to appear but claim the vid isn't him, only to have Sting come down from the rafters and smack him with the bat.

xkiller · 2nd February 2011, 18:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by phcavan

oh god no lawler as champion unless it's just a one night thing and he loses it at raw the next night

I think it would be great to see Lawler as wwe champ ,since he gets to take the belt off the most manufactured wwe champion ever and shut cole up too!!!!! that would be..... AWESOME

2nd February 2011, 19:15

Lawler will push Miz close but we all know he wont win .. the main event for mania is set in stone, miz vs cena . either cole will screw lawler leading to lawler vs cole at mania or riley will cost lawler leading to lawler vs riley at mania..

lawler will get his mania match tohough . he has acheived a lot in his career but has never had a mania match . Time is running out so they seem to be going with it this year.

Masterfox · 2nd February 2011, 20:02

What I find a bit odd is why there aren`t 2 Elimination Chamber matches for the titles.Miz has just got to beat Lawler and Edge faces of against a full Chamber? Only good thing is I hope we get to see Morrison hop around the cage like a monkey

hitting people left and right before getting eliminated.

On a side note. What really annoys me with the chamber matches is to sit through the announcers talking about how x tons of steel are built into this terrifying structure. Who cares unless someone gets hit on the head with it. DAMN...

FREAKZILLA · 2nd February 2011, 23:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Masterfox

What I find a bit odd is why there aren`t 2 Elimination Chamber matches for the titles.Miz has just got to beat Lawler and Edge faces of against a full Chamber? Only good thing is I hope we get to see Morrison hop around the cage like a monkey

hitting people left and right before getting eliminated.

On a side note. What really annoys me with the chamber matches is to sit through the announcers talking about how x tons of steel are built into this terrifying structure. Who cares unless someone gets hit on the head with it. DAMN...

I agree that is weird. I thought last year there were 2 chamber matches?????

Masterfox · 3rd February 2011, 00:31

I mean there will be 2 Chambers but one just for the Number 1 Contender spot seems wasted. Finding a contender can be done in the normal shows.

burtog · 3rd February 2011, 00:56

I think this is the 3rd year they've had two Chamber matches at one PPV.

2008: Both were for title shots at the upcoming Mania
2009: Both were for the titles themselves (two changes, Edge lost his belt & then won the other belt later in the show)
2010: Both were for the titles themselves (two changes, Cena took Sheamus' belt, and then Jericho took Undertakers)

So my guess is that Edge will lose his belt this year, just by the pattern that they've shown. And I'm guessing it'll be Edge, because I'm increasingly losing faith that the WWE will give my boy Ziggler a title run.

FREAKZILLA · 3rd February 2011, 01:40

burtog

I know about the 2 chamber matches have been at this ppv but I think are boy above is right that this year its different. Only one match is for the strap. In the past both Chambers had the strap on the line

burtog · 3rd February 2011, 04:50

This is the first year they've had one for the belt, and one for the title shot.

But 2008 had both matches for the title shot, so it's not the first time that they've used the Chamber for a shot instead of the belt itself.

I was kinda vague, but that was what I was trying to say: it's weird to have one champ be defending his belt in the chamber while the other isn't, but it's not the first time that they had a Chamber match without a belt on the line.

FREAKZILLA · 3rd February 2011, 05:09

I think the 2 chambers should be for the strap

3rd February 2011, 01:40	#1738
FREAKZILLA Registered User Postaholic Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 8,667 Thanks: 101,281 Thanked 34,460 Times in 8,207 Posts	burtog I know about the 2 chamber matches have been at this ppv but I think are boy above is right that this year its different. Only one match is for the strap. In the past both Chambers had the strap on the line __________________ EXOTIC CARS http://veterperementour.ru/t44598-exotic-cars.html TALLEST Pornstars http://veterperementour.ru/t388168-who-ar...pornstars.html

3rd February 2011, 05:09	#1740
FREAKZILLA Registered User Postaholic Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 8,667 Thanks: 101,281 Thanked 34,460 Times in 8,207 Posts	I think the 2 chambers should be for the strap __________________ EXOTIC CARS http://veterperementour.ru/t44598-exotic-cars.html TALLEST Pornstars http://veterperementour.ru/t388168-who-ar...pornstars.html

2nd February 2011, 17:11	#1731
Audiobully Registered User Addicted Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Posts: 136 Thanks: 1,587 Thanked 337 Times in 116 Posts	I thought the New York Post revealed that Sting was signed to a one year deal with the WWE, but that cannot be confirmed. I will almost be disappointed if it is Taker. What would be beyond badass is for Taker to appear but claim the vid isn't him, only to have Sting come down from the rafters and smack him with the bat.

2nd February 2011, 19:15	#1733
Alan Kellerman Guest Posts: n/a	Lawler will push Miz close but we all know he wont win .. the main event for mania is set in stone, miz vs cena . either cole will screw lawler leading to lawler vs cole at mania or riley will cost lawler leading to lawler vs riley at mania.. lawler will get his mania match tohough . he has acheived a lot in his career but has never had a mania match . Time is running out so they seem to be going with it this year.

2nd February 2011, 20:02	#1734
Masterfox Registered User Addicted Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 158 Thanks: 367 Thanked 491 Times in 150 Posts	What I find a bit odd is why there aren`t 2 Elimination Chamber matches for the titles.Miz has just got to beat Lawler and Edge faces of against a full Chamber? Only good thing is I hope we get to see Morrison hop around the cage like a monkey hitting people left and right before getting eliminated. On a side note. What really annoys me with the chamber matches is to sit through the announcers talking about how x tons of steel are built into this terrifying structure. Who cares unless someone gets hit on the head with it. DAMN...

3rd February 2011, 00:31	#1736
Masterfox Registered User Addicted Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 158 Thanks: 367 Thanked 491 Times in 150 Posts	I mean there will be 2 Chambers but one just for the Number 1 Contender spot seems wasted. Finding a contender can be done in the normal shows.

3rd February 2011, 00:56	#1737
burtog Registered User Addicted Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Suburbia Posts: 642 Thanks: 2,467 Thanked 1,518 Times in 579 Posts	I think this is the 3rd year they've had two Chamber matches at one PPV. 2008: Both were for title shots at the upcoming Mania 2009: Both were for the titles themselves (two changes, Edge lost his belt & then won the other belt later in the show) 2010: Both were for the titles themselves (two changes, Cena took Sheamus' belt, and then Jericho took Undertakers) So my guess is that Edge will lose his belt this year, just by the pattern that they've shown. And I'm guessing it'll be Edge, because I'm increasingly losing faith that the WWE will give my boy Ziggler a title run.

3rd February 2011, 04:50	#1739
burtog Registered User Addicted Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Suburbia Posts: 642 Thanks: 2,467 Thanked 1,518 Times in 579 Posts	This is the first year they've had one for the belt, and one for the title shot. But 2008 had both matches for the title shot, so it's not the first time that they've used the Chamber for a shot instead of the belt itself. I was kinda vague, but that was what I was trying to say: it's weird to have one champ be defending his belt in the chamber while the other isn't, but it's not the first time that they had a Chamber match without a belt on the line.