Online free porn at mobile phone

DoctorNo · 24th February 2023, 19:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexora

Not allowing this tantamounts to discrimination.

I don't agree with that. Porn is often sorted by sex and race, not only on this and many other forums, but also on commercial websites. We don't allow men in All Girl On Girl or white women in Ethnic Love. If we did, they would both be General Porn.

alexora · 24th February 2023, 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoctorNo

I don't agree with that. Porn is often sorted by sex and race, not only on this and many other forums.

Does this mean that women of colour are not allowed a PATM thread?

Of course it doesn't: only black men are denied that privilege - I stand steady on my previous comments.

pelham456 · 24th February 2023, 22:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexora

Does this mean that women of colour are not allowed a PATM thread?

Of course it doesn't: only black men are denied that privilege - I stand steady on my previous comments.

are white men allowed such??

are asian men?

are latino men?

your use of "only" is a tad confusing.

reclaimer · 24th February 2023, 22:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexora

My opinion, as stated in the past more than once, is that all porn performers should be allowed to have their own PATM thread, regardless of whether they are straight, gay, or transgender males.

Not allowing this tantamounts to discrimination.

I don't have an opinion on the underlying issue of who should have PATM threads, but I'm not sure discrimination is the right word. Discrimination has a negative connotation while this absolutely could be justified as a limitation imposed through necessity as moderator time is limited. If a scene has Man A and Woman B, then the scene can be posted in two PATM threads which doubles the amount of moderator time to check them.

To quote Lionel Robbin's defition of Economics:
Economics is the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.

The site isn't making a value judgement over the male performers and their importance; The site is doing what it thinks is most efficient in utilizing its scarce means (moderator time).

Lonewolf · 26th February 2023, 01:47

Okay everyone. Staff has weighed in, and the OP said he was satisfied with the responses.

Move along.

RachaelMae · 27th February 2023, 22:34

I'd adopt a LIFO (Last in/First Out) policy for request threads. Eliminates the favoritism, thread exchanging, and aligns better with the 'thread goals'.

rbn · 28th February 2023, 04:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by reclaimer

If a scene has Man A and Woman B, then the scene can be posted in two PATM threads which doubles the amount of moderator time to check them.

Sort of, only by two different posters or in two different qualities HD vs SD.
Otherwise, you can't double post the same video in PATM. Even with two girls present. You have to choose one or the other.

Pornstar And Teen Models. When I read it, it belongs to the girls of the industry.

My predilection is to the female half of the Pornstars. of whom probably make 75% or more of the names in porn. Far less males by numbers. I appreciate all who participate, whether content or conversation, no matter what your pervy tastes are. However there is no contest to the majority's nature for hot Porngirls.

I'm glad we have sections that thrive in other sexual behaviors simply for the fact that people are finding what they want. Foot fetish, got it here. Is it sex, really? IDK but for those who like it, they can find it here. Same goes for Lezbos and BBC anacondas, Gay, Straight or whatever.

Personally, I like the PATM section how it is. Undermoderated and Female

Getting the GBSL posters to split up their megathreads and start posting in the same fashion as PATM would be difficult. I doubt they would be game by spending more time and labor to enact such an endeavor.

pelham456 · 13th March 2023, 06:01

can't SOMETHING be done about the mailbox issue? every day i get messages from mods/admins, some of which request answers. of course i ignore them.

sometime a few MONTHS from now i'll finally get a handle on the overflow and THEN answer everyone. that's ridiculous.

i get having a limit, but if mods/admins can arbitrarily "override" that, any replies thereto should be included. i don't blame anyone for getting mad(der) when they write "hey, what do u mean by...?" and then are flat-out IGNORED for a reply!

one admin did a special workaround once for one particular convo we were having, and 1ce or 2ce we've moved a convo BACK to a thread since PMs were frozen, but...in general. make PMs to/from mods/admins UNLIMITED; tighten up on the rest if u must.

my 2 cents.

DarkRaven671 · 13th March 2023, 11:46

There is no issue. You just refuse to clean up your PMs. And there is no arbitrariness in the fact that PMs from staff will automatically be delivered, no matter how many PMs are already in the recipients inbox.

pelham456 · 13th March 2023, 11:55

i'm not "refusing", it just takes time.

doesn't matter to me, but don't admins/mods wonder when they say "pls answer me" and no one does? i would think THEY should be granted the power to get replies back no matter what.

like i said before, even a restricted phone can usually access 911/112/999....

26th February 2023, 01:47	#1705
Lonewolf Martha!!! Postaholic Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 7,218 Thanks: 4,505 Thanked 27,160 Times in 5,732 Posts	Okay everyone. Staff has weighed in, and the OP said he was satisfied with the responses. Move along. __________________ (signature expertly crafted by cylnz)

27th February 2023, 22:34	#1706
RachaelMae I Got Banned Addicted Join Date: Feb 2023 Posts: 150 Thanks: 347 Thanked 5,412 Times in 203 Posts	I'd adopt a LIFO (Last in/First Out) policy for request threads. Eliminates the favoritism, thread exchanging, and aligns better with the 'thread goals'.

13th March 2023, 06:01	#1708
pelham456 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 4,350 Thanks: 1,236 Thanked 4,869 Times in 2,336 Posts	can't SOMETHING be done about the mailbox issue? every day i get messages from mods/admins, some of which request answers. of course i ignore them. sometime a few MONTHS from now i'll finally get a handle on the overflow and THEN answer everyone. that's ridiculous. i get having a limit, but if mods/admins can arbitrarily "override" that, any replies thereto should be included. i don't blame anyone for getting mad(der) when they write "hey, what do u mean by...?" and then are flat-out IGNORED for a reply! one admin did a special workaround once for one particular convo we were having, and 1ce or 2ce we've moved a convo BACK to a thread since PMs were frozen, but...in general. make PMs to/from mods/admins UNLIMITED; tighten up on the rest if u must. my 2 cents.

13th March 2023, 11:46	#1709
DarkRaven671 Forum Lord Join Date: Jun 2015 Posts: 1,346 Thanks: 3,381 Thanked 5,766 Times in 1,090 Posts	There is no issue. You just refuse to clean up your PMs. And there is no arbitrariness in the fact that PMs from staff will automatically be delivered, no matter how many PMs are already in the recipients inbox.

13th March 2023, 11:55	#1710
pelham456 I Got Banned Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 4,350 Thanks: 1,236 Thanked 4,869 Times in 2,336 Posts	i'm not "refusing", it just takes time. doesn't matter to me, but don't admins/mods wonder when they say "pls answer me" and no one does? i would think THEY should be granted the power to get replies back no matter what. like i said before, even a restricted phone can usually access 911/112/999....