Online free porn at mobile phone

MIB04 · 12th June 2015, 16:57

Funny story, Ric Flair wanted to be "Rambling" Rickie Rhodes in wrestling. I think Gagne was the one who talked him into using another name. Early Flair had a lot more in common with Dusty than his later self. Flair was around 300 lbs and had a lot of Dusty mannerisms.

I was a big fan of Dusty Rhodes, and sad that he's passed on.

Quote:

I never liked Waltman. He was a douche that rode his more famous and talented friends coattails to success. There is a reason for the term X-Pac heat.

Just being associated with someone doesn't automatically give someone a rub. Sure, he got famous by being Scott Hall's sidekick, but Hall and Nash had sidekicks afterward (Louie Spicolli, Disco Inferno, Eric Young) and none got over as much as X-Pac. I also hate the term "X-Pac heat", I think it is stupid. X-Pac was never a face and booed during the "X-Pac heat" time frame. The only time you can remotely say that is when all WWE wrestlers were automatically faces against the WCW wrestlers. However, he wrestled against Kidman and maybe Helms. Nothing was remotely heel about the latter, while the former was still playing his obnoxious, slimy character. As for "X-Pac heat" being "go away heat", I disagree. The only true "go away heat" is no heat, it is no reaction (ie the "Conway pop"). If the fans actually meant go away than they shouldn't react.

Vile · 14th June 2015, 05:09

I didn't start watching wrestling on a regular basis until the early/mid 90's, so Dusty's heyday was pretty much over by then. I wasn't that familiar with him as a wrestler until I went back and watched some of his old matches. However, I have a lot of memories of him announcing matches in WCW. I'll always remember him mentioning "the pay windah," which would give some meaning to otherwise meaningless matches. The simplest storytelling; the winner gets paid more, so each guy wants to win. If you wheel! R. I. P. Dusty.

Love Buzz · 14th June 2015, 11:59

I've heard two arguments for and against an Owens victory. If he keeps winning he'll end up like Rusev who is now a broke guy on crutches in a boring angle I wish would go away. If he loses then they eventually set up a US title match at Battleship or Summershit to have a final showdown and KO wins but after having first lost the NXT title to Finn Balor in Tokyo. But then what about the rematch clause?

Since when did matches become so difficult to predict? The only 'guarantee' on the show is Seth Rollins and then he'll probably get injured and R-Truth will come down and steal the title and go on a roller coaster tour of the US with his instagram updates.

Karmafan · 14th June 2015, 14:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Love Buzz

I've heard two arguments for and against an Owens victory. If he keeps winning he'll end up like Rusev who is now a broke guy on crutches in a boring angle I wish would go away. If he loses then they eventually set up a US title match at Battleship or Summershit to have a final showdown and KO wins but after having first lost the NXT title to Finn Balor in Tokyo. But then what about the rematch clause?

Since when did matches become so difficult to predict? The only 'guarantee' on the show is Seth Rollins and then he'll probably get injured and R-Truth will come down and steal the title and go on a roller coaster tour of the US with his instagram updates.

We all know Brock is gonna come down and crush someone setting up a SS match. Would not surprise me if they let Dean win the match only to have Brock kill him after the match ends. Smart money says Rollins wins but with Brock looming on the horizon you never know.

Booster Gold · 15th June 2015, 02:06

I generally have a bad feeling about Money in the Bank.
Dean Ambrose should be in the Money in the Bank ladder match as he would benefit the most from being Mr. Money in the Bank. Why would Roman Reigns, with his superman booking need the briefcase anyway? It doesn't make any sense to me.

Not bad. Sheamus winning was a bit unexpected but it's a good start.

Booster Gold · 15th June 2015, 02:55

Infinite facepalm...

because one facepalm isn't enough

Rick Sanchez · 15th June 2015, 03:29

These cheap wins over Paige have gone on for far too long. It's not as bad as constant clean losses, but it can only go so long before people get tired of it.

Booster Gold · 15th June 2015, 04:58

I guess more facepalms are in order.
Dean Ambrose no selling an epic beatdown by Rollins was just wrong. So wrong.
On the bright side, Dean Ambrose looked insanely strong in defeat and Rollins is still champion.

Grandmaster_J · 15th June 2015, 05:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemmy Kilmister

These cheap wins over Paige have gone on for far too long. It's not as bad as constant clean losses, but it can only go so long before people get tired of it.

Got tired of it and Nikki Bella a long time ago... No hope for the divas, none

Quote:

Originally Posted by Booster Gold

I guess more facepalms are in order.
Dean Ambrose no selling an epic beatdown by Rollins was just wrong. So wrong.
On the bright side, Dean Ambrose looked insanely strong in defeat and Rollins is still champion.

When he re-climbed the ladder at the end? At the end of the match I liked that he sold disappoint.. look on his face added to the story being told. Not to mention I don't see much of bright side to Rollins remaining champion with Nipple H clenching to him.

Booster Gold · 15th June 2015, 05:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grandmaster_J

When he re-climbed the ladder at the end?

No, it was before that.
Dean took a ladder to the face, 2 powerbombs to the barricade and was buried under a ladder and what looked like a dozen chairs. Ideally, Dean should have sold the beatdown by not getting up and Seth Rollins should have won clean. Sadly that did not happen and thus the end of the match was an epic fail.

15th June 2015, 02:06	#15185
Booster Gold V.I.P. Postaholic Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: C-53 Posts: 8,371 Thanks: 31,677 Thanked 72,950 Times in 8,246 Posts	I generally have a bad feeling about Money in the Bank. Dean Ambrose should be in the Money in the Bank ladder match as he would benefit the most from being Mr. Money in the Bank. Why would Roman Reigns, with his superman booking need the briefcase anyway? It doesn't make any sense to me. Not bad. Sheamus winning was a bit unexpected but it's a good start. __________________ ... Last edited by Booster Gold; 15th June 2015 at 02:37. Reason: SheamusWinsLOL

15th June 2015, 02:55	#15186
Booster Gold V.I.P. Postaholic Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: C-53 Posts: 8,371 Thanks: 31,677 Thanked 72,950 Times in 8,246 Posts	My thoughts on the Divas Match Infinite facepalm... because one facepalm isn't enough __________________ ...

15th June 2015, 03:29	#15187
Rick Sanchez Registered User Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Earth C-137 Posts: 2,137 Thanks: 4,347 Thanked 6,458 Times in 1,612 Posts	These cheap wins over Paige have gone on for far too long. It's not as bad as constant clean losses, but it can only go so long before people get tired of it. __________________ "Weddings are basically funerals with cake." July 17, 1975 - September 1, 2021. Dark Humor Enthusiast

15th June 2015, 04:58	#15188
Booster Gold V.I.P. Postaholic Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: C-53 Posts: 8,371 Thanks: 31,677 Thanked 72,950 Times in 8,246 Posts	I guess more facepalms are in order. Dean Ambrose no selling an epic beatdown by Rollins was just wrong. So wrong. On the bright side, Dean Ambrose looked insanely strong in defeat and Rollins is still champion. __________________ ...

14th June 2015, 05:09	#15182
Vile Registered User Addicted Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 825 Thanks: 1,544 Thanked 2,619 Times in 750 Posts	I didn't start watching wrestling on a regular basis until the early/mid 90's, so Dusty's heyday was pretty much over by then. I wasn't that familiar with him as a wrestler until I went back and watched some of his old matches. However, I have a lot of memories of him announcing matches in WCW. I'll always remember him mentioning "the pay windah," which would give some meaning to otherwise meaningless matches. The simplest storytelling; the winner gets paid more, so each guy wants to win. If you wheel! R. I. P. Dusty.

14th June 2015, 11:59	#15183
Love Buzz Marginalised & Ostracised Clinically Insane Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 3,661 Thanks: 5,723 Thanked 13,028 Times in 2,763 Posts	I've heard two arguments for and against an Owens victory. If he keeps winning he'll end up like Rusev who is now a broke guy on crutches in a boring angle I wish would go away. If he loses then they eventually set up a US title match at Battleship or Summershit to have a final showdown and KO wins but after having first lost the NXT title to Finn Balor in Tokyo. But then what about the rematch clause? Since when did matches become so difficult to predict? The only 'guarantee' on the show is Seth Rollins and then he'll probably get injured and R-Truth will come down and steal the title and go on a roller coaster tour of the US with his instagram updates.