|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Sex & Porn Discussion Adult topics. |
|
Thread Tools |
Yesterday, 10:22 | #1 |
V.I.P.
Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,291
Thanks: 4,150
Thanked 9,621 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
body count and sluts
So I have noticed a whole obsession, especially among younger men, with body counts.
Specifically the number of prior sexual partners a girl had. It's something quite a bit puzzling for me. I have always preferred girls with a decent amount of sexual experience, meaning that they are comfortable in bed and adventurous enough to do most sex acts. Why would I want to fuck a girl who has only been with one or two guys and is too prudish to move out of her comfort zone? Given the choice, I'd totally choose a filthy slut who has 101 ways to get a guy off. The obsession with your partner having a low body count seems very self-defeating if you want to have good sex. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Johnny Cage For This Useful Post: |
|
Yesterday, 11:59 | #2 |
Junior Member
Addicted Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 198
Thanks: 492
Thanked 831 Times in 191 Posts
|
For me it's a huge turn on if she had many partners and was previously a slut. Given my love for interracial porn it's even more of a turn on if she has fucked black guys.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Split on Aces For This Useful Post: |
Yesterday, 17:54 | #3 |
I Need More Sleep
Addicted Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 804
Thanks: 47,043
Thanked 2,160 Times in 652 Posts
|
You are mistaken. They only care about body counts when it comes to long term partners. Few men will turn down an available women unless they display obvious signs of stds.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to uglybob For This Useful Post: |
Yesterday, 18:30 | #4 |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 875
Thanks: 9,484
Thanked 2,317 Times in 737 Posts
|
In my opinion it's a result of deep insecurity. Some guys are afraid that if a woman has many others to compare them to, they might come up short (in more ways than one). Then there are some guys who have a really intense "possessiveness" mania who want to feel that a woman "belongs" to them. Really creepy if you ask me.
Sex, just like many things in life, is a skill you can be good, poor or exceptional at. The only way to become a good sexual partner, is to have lots of sex. And I don't mean only in quantity, but to engage in various sexual acts, and yes, with different people. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kassidiaris For This Useful Post: |
Yesterday, 19:57 | #5 |
Registered User
Addicted Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 379 Times in 126 Posts
|
I personally don't mind marrying or dating a slut or a former slut as long as she meets my other standards for being a partner and we are compatible. That being said I don't have any desires or fantasies of her fucking other men. A high body count doesn't necessarily bother me. I rather be with a woman who likes having sex and is comfortable with it than someone who is uptight and prude about sex and I'm not even crazy into sex like that.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bigfan99 For This Useful Post: |
Yesterday, 21:37 | #6 |
Clinically Insane Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 3,668
Thanks: 5,970
Thanked 80,145 Times in 6,990 Posts
|
Two things to keep in mind:
Body counts like most things depend on the context, particularly age. If someone is 22 and has had 100 partners, that means they've potentially had sex with a new person every two weeks since they've been legal. That's generally not the behavior of someone who is capable of having a long-term relationship. If a woman is 40 and has had 100 partners, that's on average 4.5 partners a year since they've been legal. Unless most of those have been recent, that's not really that meaningful. The sum of a person's sexual partners is not directly related to how much sex a person has had. People in long term relationships (generally) have more sex than people who are not. More partners might give someone a broader range of experience, but most people suck at sex and sex with strangers is rarely as satisfying as sex with a longer-term partner. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to reclaimer For This Useful Post: |
Today, 10:35 | #7 | |
V.I.P.
Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,291
Thanks: 4,150
Thanked 9,621 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
And in terms of a long-term partner, the same logic still applies: I'd prefer someone who is good at sex. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Cage For This Useful Post: |
Today, 10:36 | #8 | |
V.I.P.
Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,291
Thanks: 4,150
Thanked 9,621 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Cage For This Useful Post: |
Today, 10:39 | #9 | |
V.I.P.
Clinically Insane Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,291
Thanks: 4,150
Thanked 9,621 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
And whilst 100 is at the higher end of the scale, even if she only became sexually active at say 18, that's still only 25 guys a year or like two different guys a month, give or take. If you are in the super-casual Tinder game, like a lot of young folks are, it's probably not too hard to get close to that number. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|