Do you believe Sandy Hook Hoax?

[balbasboa]

I believe its a hoax. You can tell because in a digital age of information the only photo the media kept showing of the Sandy Hook shooter week after week was a small, fuzzy, out of date, black & white mugshot. They seemed fixated on it, as if they wanted to show he was alive during a different era of history, like looking a passport photo from the Titanic. They corrected this practice by the time of the Boston Marathon event in 2013 by putting up more diverse stock photos of the alleged perpetrator(s).

It is a hoax much the same way that Jennifer Lawrence makes millions of dollars as an actress, and yet the best cell phone she can afford takes such small and blurry selfie pics

[ilovesex415]

1. The news covered the story immediately, that is true.
2. I agree Sandy Hook could be used to push gun control.
3. When people die (children and adults in this case) yes, intense emotion is received.
4. The media always gets shit wrong.
5. Wasn't there pictures of the deceased?
6. There was a school shooting drill held nearby, also close in time to Sandy Hook took place. Unfortunate and weird coincidence, is all that it is, a coincidence.
Can you elaborate on number 7?

Originally Posted by Brokentwice

7. Mainstream corporate media manipulation tactics

8. Because it received attention from the Feds, it's a false flag?

Originally Posted by balbasboa

I believe its a hoax. You can tell because in a digital age of information the only photo the media kept showing of the Sandy Hook shooter week after week was a small, fuzzy, out of date, black & white mugshot.

The mugshot I saw was in color. I "heard" there wasn't many photos of Lanza. Plus, the media wanted to portray him as a bad, and in this case he was. I believe they may have photoshopped his picture to portray him differently to society. So just because of this fuzzy picture, this is a hoax?

I appreciate the feedback in favor of a hoax. Just trying to understand all the facts.

[DemonicGeek]

Originally Posted by ilovesex415

Personally, I do not. I know this is a little late to start a thread on this topic but, recently the incident popped up around the internet due to FBl recording zero shooting deaths for 2012 or something.

I'm down to call something a conspiracy if there is strong evidence supporting it. In this case, the evidence is not in favor of the shooting being a hoax.

Evidence in favor of a hoax:
1. Wayne Carver was acting abnormal. I've give you that one, doesn't prove anything definitively. He's probably just a weird guy.
2. There was discrepancy of the weapons Adam used. This is hardly an argument in my opinion, the news often gets things wrong, especially in the infancy of the reporting stage.
3. Missing video surveillance footage. I can't explain that one, doesn't prove a hoax, but could lead to a cover up, I can see that...
4. People were 'acting' as parents of the deceased. We are human, we get nervous, we laugh to hide our pain, again, I do not think this proves anything.
5. 'Everyone must check in sign' This seems standard to me, as it is a crime scene.
6. The Christmas trees were brought from the firehouse to the school. To me, this doesn't mean shit.


Evidence against it being hoax:
1. There is plenty of footage of people evacuating.
2. There is witness testimony from teachers, neighbors in the area.
3. The names of the children were released on grievance sites, even though conspiracy theorists insist no names were released.
4. No gun control laws were created as a result of the shooting? Someone can correct me on that one if they wish.
5. Someone would have most likely spoken up, if people were alive that should have been deceased.
6. To me, it just seems to real to be fake (I could have been fooled). But hey, prove me wrong! Show me the evidence it was a hoax.

I've watched several videos from several sources. And read newspaper articles, websites on the shooting. The view points that I have gathered about not seeing blood, frantic people in the news are quite weak arguments to me; the news generally does not want to show gore and people in a frenzy/panic.

I've looked at the conspiracy stuff and it tends to really reach I'd say...it also tends t get into saying the Tuscon shootings and Aurora shootings were conspiracies too...which further strains credulity.

And for Sandy Hook to be a conspiracy...there would be way too many players for the thing to hold up over the years.

And the government doesn't need to stage mass shootings of its own...they occur on their own. Eventually something like Sandy Hook was gonna happen, and may happen again in the future.

And if it was meant to usher in gun control, the stepping stone measures to march towards heavier and heavier control failed at the national level.

In the states you saw something in New York, Connecticut, and Colorado. Not exactly popular laws either.

If the government was gonna do a false flag thing...I'd imagine it'd be a big fatality thing, and you'd need as few players as possible.

[DoctorNo]

While you can discuss whether a not so current event happened. You are not allowed to discuss gun control, because we don't allow politics.

Posts removed.

[Brokentwice]

Here's a great article explaining this event.

http://veteranstoday.com/2014/01...laborate-hoax/

[DoctorNo]