Online free porn at mobile phone

cunti · 5th October 2016, 02:31

Once there was a desi-british porn star called Anjali Kara. I think she already retired, but I noticed one thing in her scenes.
She is never fully naked in her scenes. It is weird. She wears nearly the same thing in the end of the clips as in the beginning. She only pulled her slip and her boobs plopped out but she always has her shoes on and wears the dress, she only opens the necessary space. That is somehow weird and I don't get it. Does she have an ugly tattoo or somehow a place on her body that she wants to hide?
And are others like that you know?

Karmafan · 5th October 2016, 02:44

Usually its to hide belly fat or a C section scar (meaning they had a kid).

chad1984 · 5th October 2016, 03:06

kiara mia (check out her oil overload scene and you can actually see some sort of burn marks like marks on her belly)

redsox1211 · 5th October 2016, 04:02

I personally think its weird and a turn off when a girl gets naked fully but leaves on her shoes, heels boots etc. its like your naked but dont want to be barefoot? not really a foot fetish thing just looks odd seeing a naked girl then a pair of reeboks

Wedge7 · 5th October 2016, 04:07

It's an old cliche' in porn that women look sexier/sluttier if they leave their heels on. Every time I've got naked with a woman, the shoes were always the first thing to come off, mine and hers.

thruster315 · 5th October 2016, 04:10

Wasn't the late 80's/ early 90's pornstar Aja the one that had an appendectomy scar or something on her belly area? It wasn't a C-section scar as it was relatively tiny but they always hid it with some article of clothing.

Also Aimee Sweet also had this huge spade tattoo right above her hip that back then no one wanted to see. Now tattoos are like buckshot on a fresh kill. How far things have gone!

cunti · 5th October 2016, 04:21

Yes I am somehow old fashioned. I thing people in porn should be fully naked :P The things with shoes/boots are also annoying. In the case of Anjali Kara her body is covered like 60% and she also wears boots in her scenes. She doesn't even show knees not to mention the rest.
that is a typical scene

I think she's hot but that habbit somehow ruined all for me.

Wedge7 · 5th October 2016, 04:27

That's right, she was a Killergr@m girl. Isn't that site notorious for keeping clothes on a girl throughout their scenes?

thruster315 · 5th October 2016, 04:29

Obviously I'm not a huge fan of the gals just stark naked, nude and in the buff to start the scenes. There's no build-up, no reveal, no sensuality whatsoever as it's just a gorgeous body. Now toss in some revealing clothes, some lingerie, and some sensual shake & bake... and we're on. Shoes or boots- as sexy as they are to start with do need to eventually come off just for the functionality of vigorous fucking- if the positions call for it.

I've always chuckled back in the late 80's/ early 90's when waterbeds were still somewhat the rage and wanted to see some starlet wearing stilettos puncture the mattress in mid-fuck.

cunti · 5th October 2016, 04:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wedge7

That's right, she was a Killergr@m girl. Isn't that site notorious for keeping clothes on a girl throughout their scenes?

Yes that's right, she mainly did scenes for them but I didn't know that they are notorious for that. This makes it even more weird. Is there a reason for that policy?

I have nothing against sexy clothes. I would prefer a scene that starts with clothes instead of starting naked, except it's a shower scene. But it should be a progress where the actor is getting from dressed to undressed. That's what I think

5th October 2016, 02:31	#1
cunti Registered User Addicted Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 401 Thanks: 1,790 Thanked 543 Times in 245 Posts	Why are some girls never fully naked in porn? Once there was a desi-british porn star called Anjali Kara. I think she already retired, but I noticed one thing in her scenes. She is never fully naked in her scenes. It is weird. She wears nearly the same thing in the end of the clips as in the beginning. She only pulled her slip and her boobs plopped out but she always has her shoes on and wears the dress, she only opens the necessary space. That is somehow weird and I don't get it. Does she have an ugly tattoo or somehow a place on her body that she wants to hide? And are others like that you know?

5th October 2016, 04:07	#5
Wedge7 Vintage Postaholic Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Bumfuct, Egypt Posts: 8,408 Thanks: 36,893 Thanked 54,929 Times in 8,128 Posts	It's an old cliche' in porn that women look sexier/sluttier if they leave their heels on. Every time I've got naked with a woman, the shoes were always the first thing to come off, mine and hers. __________________ *New video:* http://veterperementour.ru/showpost.p...5&postcount=44

5th October 2016, 04:27	#8
Wedge7 Vintage Postaholic Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Bumfuct, Egypt Posts: 8,408 Thanks: 36,893 Thanked 54,929 Times in 8,128 Posts	That's right, she was a Killergr@m girl. Isn't that site notorious for keeping clothes on a girl throughout their scenes? __________________ *New video:* http://veterperementour.ru/showpost.p...5&postcount=44

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

5th October 2016, 02:44	#2
Karmafan Who Cut The Cheese? Beyond Redemption Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 11,387 Thanks: 39,606 Thanked 38,122 Times in 9,854 Posts	Usually its to hide belly fat or a C section scar (meaning they had a kid).

5th October 2016, 03:06	#3
chad1984 Registered User Addicted Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 665 Thanks: 9,572 Thanked 985 Times in 381 Posts	kiara mia (check out her oil overload scene and you can actually see some sort of burn marks like marks on her belly)

5th October 2016, 04:02	#4
redsox1211 Registered User Forum Lord Join Date: May 2014 Posts: 1,051 Thanks: 2,952 Thanked 1,650 Times in 634 Posts	I personally think its weird and a turn off when a girl gets naked fully but leaves on her shoes, heels boots etc. its like your naked but dont want to be barefoot? not really a foot fetish thing just looks odd seeing a naked girl then a pair of reeboks

5th October 2016, 04:10	#6
thruster315 V.I.P. Beyond Redemption Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: wherever you need me Posts: 71,706 Thanks: 210,811 Thanked 328,375 Times in 69,109 Posts	Wasn't the late 80's/ early 90's pornstar Aja the one that had an appendectomy scar or something on her belly area? It wasn't a C-section scar as it was relatively tiny but they always hid it with some article of clothing. Also Aimee Sweet also had this huge spade tattoo right above her hip that back then no one wanted to see. Now tattoos are like buckshot on a fresh kill. How far things have gone!

5th October 2016, 04:21	#7
cunti Registered User Addicted Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 401 Thanks: 1,790 Thanked 543 Times in 245 Posts	Yes I am somehow old fashioned. I thing people in porn should be fully naked :P The things with shoes/boots are also annoying. In the case of Anjali Kara her body is covered like 60% and she also wears boots in her scenes. She doesn't even show knees not to mention the rest. that is a typical scene I think she's hot but that habbit somehow ruined all for me.

5th October 2016, 04:29	#9
thruster315 V.I.P. Beyond Redemption Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: wherever you need me Posts: 71,706 Thanks: 210,811 Thanked 328,375 Times in 69,109 Posts	Obviously I'm not a huge fan of the gals just stark naked, nude and in the buff to start the scenes. There's no build-up, no reveal, no sensuality whatsoever as it's just a gorgeous body. Now toss in some revealing clothes, some lingerie, and some sensual shake & bake... and we're on. Shoes or boots- as sexy as they are to start with do need to eventually come off just for the functionality of vigorous fucking- if the positions call for it. I've always chuckled back in the late 80's/ early 90's when waterbeds were still somewhat the rage and wanted to see some starlet wearing stilettos puncture the mattress in mid-fuck.