|
![]() |
Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Sex & Porn Discussion Adult topics. |
View Poll Results: Do you think Trans Women Should Have a PATM Thread? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 43.33% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 56.67% |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Why are trans pornstars segregated from PATM?
I think we need to remove all African American, Latina, Middle Eastern, Asian, and other associated minorities from PATM!! White anglo genetic females only!!! Lunacy. . . . . jmtc |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Forum Lord Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,687
Thanks: 1,397
Thanked 7,548 Times in 1,507 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() People still freak out over this and don't want to come across it without warning. hard to hear I know but understandable.
I actually have no problem with a bit of 'segregation', sub-categories or just very detailed thread titles. Anything that makes it easier to search for what we want and avoid what we don't. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Anadin For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() Beyond Redemption Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,148
Thanks: 29,436
Thanked 368,577 Times in 11,873 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trilight For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Just trying to bring the Planet in line with contemporary thought. Then again most people are ignorant of history and historical trends. |
|
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Beyond Redemption Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,148
Thanks: 29,436
Thanked 368,577 Times in 11,873 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I know that you are not the president of the United States but I haven't seen any contribution from you. It must have been very far behind the scenes.
![]() The current setup with shemales in a separated section has the advantage that you can easily find your shemale content and I can easily avoid this content. That should make the vast majority (not only you and me) of the forum users happy. I haven't seen a serious request from you to integrate Shemales into PATM and a serious discussion about it. But again this might be either very far behind the scenes or deep in the sex&porn discussion section that I typically avoid. If there was ever such a serious request then it is predictable that the motion was denied. Splitting out about about a third of PATM into other section is time-consummating; very time-consummating! I doubt that you understand the load on the mods. You haven't explained in this poll why it should be done and what's the advantage for the forum. It's just between the lines that you are either disappointed or drunk or both. I didn't vote in your poll and I don't say that it should not be done. In fact, I do not care anymore about PATM changes. The majority of the changes of the last 12 months very anyway bad, so why not another bad change ![]() But I believe that I have still the right (because I have wasted a lot of time in the organization of that section) to question your majestic plural that WE have to to implement that change. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Trilight For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#7 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
My suggestion to split ethnicities other than anglo females from PATM was for effect, not an actual suggestion. My goal is to add transgender women to PATM in dedicated threads following the same rules as all other PATM threads. It would require zero additional work from the mods to allow a handful of new threads. As far as a discussion goes, that is what you are engaging in ![]() I was a mod for just over a year, yes at this site. If you didn't know we are allowed to change our usernames ![]() |
|
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#8 |
Old Guard Militia
![]() Beyond Redemption Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germania
Posts: 15,250
Thanks: 36,786
Thanked 66,007 Times in 8,136 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I must missed that.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Toto For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Novice
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
Thanks: 414
Thanked 238 Times in 61 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I won't vote 'yes', simply because I don't think it's necessary (the poll asks if it SHOULD be done). I'm not against it, though if it's to be done, I think it should (or rather, in my personal view, MUST
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to imamadman For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|